Note at the end of Sinaiticus Job?

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Blood
Posts: 899
Joined: Sun Oct 06, 2013 8:03 am

Note at the end of Sinaiticus Job?

Post by Blood »

What is this note at the end of the book of Job (folio 199) in Codex Sinaiticus? Matthew begins on the next page (folio 200).

http://www.codexsinaiticus.org/en/manus ... omSlider=0

Job, 42:9 - 42:17 library: BL folio: 199b scribe: A

κηϲ βιβλου
εν μεν γη τη αυϲειτιδι κατοικων ·
επι τοιϲ οριοιϲ τηϲ ϊδουμαιαϲ
και αραβιαϲ
προϋπηρχεν δε αυτω ονομα ϊωβαβ
λαβων δε γυναικα αραβιϲϲαν
γεννα ϋϊον . ω ονομα εννων
ην δε αυτοϲ πατροϲ μεν ζαρε · των
ηϲαυ ϋϊων ϋϊοϲ
μητροϲ δε βοϲορραϲ
ωϲτε ειναι αυτον πεμπτον απο αβρααμ
και ουτοι οι βαϲιλειϲ · οι βαϲιλευϲαν
τεϲ εν εδωμʼ ηϲ και αυτοϲ
ηρξεν χωραϲ
πρωτοϲ βαλακ · ο του βαιωρ
και ονομα τη πολει αυτου δενναβα
μετα δε βαλακʼ ϊωβαβʼ ο καλουμενοϲ ϊωβʼ ·
μετα δε τουτον αϲομʼ ο ϋπαρχων ηγεμω
εκ τηϲ θαιμανιτιδοϲ χωραϲ
μετα δε τουτον αδαδʼ υϊοϲ βαρα ο εκκο
ψαϲ μαδιαμʼ εν τω παιδιω μωαβʼ
και ονομα τη πολει αυτου γεθθαιμ
οι δε ελθοντεϲ προϲ αυτον φιλοι
ελειφαζʼ των ηϲαυ ϋϊων ˙ θαιμα
νων βαϲιλευϲ
βαλδαδʼ ο ϲαυχαιων τυραννοϲ
ϲωιφαρ · ο μιναιων βαϲιλευϲ

(in a different, later hand)
ϊωβ
ὁ παλαιᾶϲ καὶ καινῆϲ διαθήκηϲ θϲ ˙ ὁ ἐν τριάδι ὑ
μνούμενοϲ ˙ καὶ ἐν μονάδι δοξολογούμενοϲ αὐτὸϲ
δέξαι τὴν μετάνοιαν τοῦ ἁμαρτωλοῦ θεοφυλά
κτου ˙ καὶ ἀξίωϲον αὐτὸν τυχεῖν τῆϲ βαϲιλείαϲ ϲου ˙ διὰ
ϲπλάχνα ἐλέουϲ ϲου ˙ καὶ ἐλέοϲ ἀμέτρητον:
“The only sensible response to fragmented, slowly but randomly accruing evidence is radical open-mindedness. A single, simple explanation for a historical event is generally a failure of imagination, not a triumph of induction.” William H.C. Propp
Kunigunde Kreuzerin
Posts: 2110
Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 2:19 pm
Location: Leipzig, Germany
Contact:

Re: Note at the end of Sinaiticus Job?

Post by Kunigunde Kreuzerin »

Blood wrote:What is this note at the end of the book of Job (folio 199) in Codex Sinaiticus? Matthew begins on the next page (folio 200).

ὁ παλαιᾶϲ καὶ καινῆϲ διαθήκηϲ θϲ ˙ ὁ ἐν τριάδι ὑ
μνούμενοϲ ˙ καὶ ἐν μονάδι δοξολογούμενοϲ αὐτὸϲ
δέξαι τὴν μετάνοιαν τοῦ ἁμαρτωλοῦ θεοφυλά
κτου ˙ καὶ ἀξίωϲον αὐτὸν τυχεῖν τῆϲ βαϲιλείαϲ ϲου ˙ διὰ
ϲπλάχνα ἐλέουϲ ϲου ˙ καὶ ἐλέοϲ ἀμέτρητον:
= Theophylact
a note of that scribe
Blood wrote:What is this note at the end of the book of Job (folio 199) in Codex Sinaiticus? Matthew begins on the next page (folio 200).

ὁ παλαιᾶϲ καὶ καινῆϲ διαθήκηϲ θϲ ˙ ὁ ἐν τριάδι ὑ
μνούμενοϲ ˙ καὶ ἐν μονάδι δοξολογούμενοϲ αὐτὸϲ
δέξαι τὴν μετάνοιαν τοῦ ἁμαρτωλοῦ θεοφυλά
κτου ˙ καὶ ἀξίωϲον αὐτὸν τυχεῖν τῆϲ βαϲιλείαϲ ϲου ˙ διὰ
ϲπλάχνα ἐλέουϲ ϲου ˙ καὶ ἐλέοϲ ἀμέτρητον:
some snippets with my poor Greek

old and new testament (covenant) of god ... glorified in trinity but one (?) ...take the repentance of the sinner Theophylact (?) ... and think worthy of him to receive your kingdom through your heart (?) of mercy and your countless mercy (?)
Steven Avery
Posts: 978
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 9:27 am

Re: Note at the end of Sinaiticus Job?

Post by Steven Avery »

Hi,

> "Kunigunde Kreuzerin"
> = Theophylact a note of that scribe

Some more info here:

============================

PureBible Forum
https://www.facebook.com/groups/purebib ... omments=49

CSP Transcription:
ϊωβ
ὁ παλαιᾶϲ καὶ καινῆϲ διαθήκηϲ θϲ ˙ ὁ ἐν τριάδι ὑ
μνούμενοϲ ˙ καὶ ἐν μονάδι δοξολογούμενοϲ αὐτὸϲ
δέξαι τὴν μετάνοιαν τοῦ ἁμαρτωλοῦ θεοφυλά
κτου ˙ καὶ ἀξίωϲον αὐτὸν τυχεῖν τῆϲ βαϲιλείαϲ ϲου ˙ διὰ
ϲπλάχνα ἐλέουϲ ϲου ˙ καὶ ἐλέοϲ ἀμέτρητον:

The part that is sometimes noted is where he references himself as the repentant sinner Theophylact.

τὴν μετάνοιαν τοῦ ἁμαρτωλοῦ θεοφυλά

Remember too that in Codex Simoneidos / Sinaiticus, this is the separation point from the OT and NT.

============================

When did the insertion of title-page for Old Testament and New Testament started?
http://christianity.stackexchange.com/q ... nt-started

just a restatement of a creed:

ϊωβ Job –
ὁ παλαιᾶϲ καὶ καινῆϲ διαθήκηϲ θϲ God’s (θϲ) Old and new teachings
˙ ὁ ἐν τριάδι ὑ μνούμενοϲ ˙ He in Trinity is one
καὶ ἐν μονάδι δοξολογούμενοϲ And is worshipped in one
αὐτὸϲ δέξαι He is glorified
τὴν μετάνοιαν τοῦ ἁμαρτωλοῦ θεοφυλά κτου ˙ by the repentance of sinners (added - SA "Theophylact")

============================

Steven Avery
User avatar
DCHindley
Posts: 3401
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:53 am
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: Note at the end of Sinaiticus Job?

Post by DCHindley »

διαθήκη , ἡ, (διατίθημι)

A.disposition of property by will, testament, Ar.V.584,589, D.27.13, etc.; κατὰ διαθήκην by will, OGI753.8 (Cilicia), Test.Epict.4.8, BGU1113.5 (i B.C.), etc.: in pl., “διαθήκας διαθέσθαι” Lys.19.39; “θέσθαι” CIG2690 (Iasus).

II. αἱ ἀπόρρητοι δ. [forbidden dispositions] mystic deposits on which the common weal depended, prob. oracles (cf. διαθέτης), Din.1.9 codd.

2. name of an eyesalve, because the recipe was deposited in a temple, Aët.7.118.

III. compact, covenant, “ἢν μὴ διαθῶνται διαθήκην ἐμοί” [this is not according to the arrangement of my covenant]Ar.Av.440; freq. in LXX, Ge. 6.18, al.; καινή, παλαιὰ δ. [good, ancient covenant], Ev.Luc.22.20, 2 Ep.Cor.3.14; disposition (with allusion to 1), Ep.Gal.3.15, cf. Ep.Hebr.9.15.

IV. = διάθεσις [placing in order, arrangement] 11 [= not clear what this refers to, does it mean II above, or is something missing?], “σώματος δ.” [bodily disposition] Democr.9.
Steven Avery
Posts: 978
Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 9:27 am

you'll wonder where the yellow went

Post by Steven Avery »

Hi,

Keep in mind, though, that the physical evidence is against Sinaiticus being a 4th century text, and then its various notes being a bit later.

This can be easily seen in Codex Friderico-Augustanus, the part that went to Leipzig in 1844. By looking at its white parchment, no stain, pepsodent, condition

Steven
Maestroh
Posts: 169
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2016 10:03 am

Re: you'll wonder where the yellow went

Post by Maestroh »

Steven Avery wrote: Fri Oct 24, 2014 12:35 pm Hi,

Keep in mind, though, that the physical evidence is against Sinaiticus being a 4th century text, and then its various notes being a bit later.
Narrator:
"Actually, the evidence shows otherwise>"

Steven Avery wrote: Fri Oct 24, 2014 12:35 pm This can be easily seen in Codex Friderico-Augustanus, the part that went to Leipzig in 1844. By looking at its white parchment, no stain, pepsodent, condition

Steven
Professor Bumbletwit here, who:
a) has ZERO expertise in any relevant religion field
b) thinks the moon landing was fake
c) thinks Building 7 was an inside job
d) is a rabid anti-vaxxer

isn't sharing with you the words of the professors who have basically told him he's full of it on this subject.

I can't imagine why.
User avatar
mlinssen
Posts: 3431
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2019 11:01 am
Location: The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Note at the end of Sinaiticus Job?

Post by mlinssen »

viewtopic.php?p=147509#p147509

viewtopic.php?p=147540#p147540

I wonder when the follow up on those two will be...
Ulan
Posts: 1505
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2014 3:58 am

Re: you'll wonder where the yellow went

Post by Ulan »

Steven Avery wrote: Fri Oct 24, 2014 12:35 pm This can be easily seen in Codex Friderico-Augustanus, the part that went to Leipzig in 1844. By looking at its white parchment, no stain, pepsodent, condition
Funny that your still repeat this lie, although you have already admitted that this point is wrong. The Codex Friderico-Augustanus isn't white and has stains on every single page.
Post Reply