The Tide Turns

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
outhouse
Posts: 3577
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 6:48 pm

Re: The Tide Turns

Post by outhouse »

Stephan Huller wrote:Right and I always think that we have to be careful to imitate our adversaries. They look stupid in their certainty, we too look stupid when we seem entrenched in our certainties. In both cases it comes down to personal biases.

.
Nope.

It is much easier to fall into a conspiracy minded philosophy and reduce evidence to the inane.
andrewcriddle
Posts: 2817
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 12:36 am

Re: The Tide Turns

Post by andrewcriddle »

juttajxwa wrote:He proved that the Acts of the Apostles was actually written in A.D 638!!
AD 638 is when the Arab invaders took Jerusalem, but the connection escapes me.

Andrew Criddle
User avatar
DCHindley
Posts: 3411
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:53 am
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: The Tide Turns

Post by DCHindley »

andrewcriddle wrote:
juttajxwa wrote:He proved that the Acts of the Apostles was actually written in A.D 638!!
AD 638 is when the Arab invaders took Jerusalem, but the connection escapes me.

Andrew Criddle
It is perhaps a "ghostly" connection?
User avatar
Peter Kirby
Site Admin
Posts: 8015
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 2:13 pm
Location: Santa Clara
Contact:

Re: The Tide Turns

Post by Peter Kirby »

Leucius Charinus wrote:
juttajxwa wrote:He proved that the Acts of the Apostles was actually written in A.D 638!!
Who proved this? Emerson, Lake or Palmer?

Nice first post juttajxwa (I wonder who this is?)
My first assumption is that it is a spammer. Perhaps they're getting more clever. They do seem to be planting accounts to add links on later.
"... almost every critical biblical position was earlier advanced by skeptics." - Raymond Brown
Post Reply