Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
outhouse
Posts: 3577 Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 6:48 pm
Post
by outhouse » Wed Oct 22, 2014 8:28 am
Stephan Huller wrote: Right and I always think that we have to be careful to imitate our adversaries. They look stupid in their certainty, we too look stupid when we seem entrenched in our certainties. In both cases it comes down to personal biases.
.
Nope.
It is much easier to fall into a conspiracy minded philosophy and reduce evidence to the inane.
andrewcriddle
Posts: 2817 Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 12:36 am
Post
by andrewcriddle » Wed Oct 22, 2014 11:12 am
juttajxwa wrote: He proved that the Acts of the Apostles was actually written in A.D 638!!
AD 638 is when the Arab invaders took Jerusalem, but the connection escapes me.
Andrew Criddle
DCHindley
Posts: 3411 Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:53 am
Location: Ohio, USA
Post
by DCHindley » Wed Oct 22, 2014 2:17 pm
andrewcriddle wrote: juttajxwa wrote: He proved that the Acts of the Apostles was actually written in A.D 638!!
AD 638 is when the Arab invaders took Jerusalem, but the connection escapes me.
Andrew Criddle
It is perhaps a "ghostly" connection?
Peter Kirby
Site Admin
Posts: 8015 Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 2:13 pm
Location: Santa Clara
Contact:
Post
by Peter Kirby » Fri Oct 24, 2014 9:05 pm
Leucius Charinus wrote: juttajxwa wrote: He proved that the Acts of the Apostles was actually written in A.D 638!!
Who proved this? Emerson, Lake or Palmer?
Nice first post juttajxwa (I wonder who this is?)
My first assumption is that it is a spammer. Perhaps they're getting more clever. They do seem to be planting accounts to add links on later.
"... almost every critical biblical position was earlier advanced by skeptics." - Raymond Brown