Page 7 of 7

Re: The Tide Turns

Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 8:28 am
by outhouse
Stephan Huller wrote:Right and I always think that we have to be careful to imitate our adversaries. They look stupid in their certainty, we too look stupid when we seem entrenched in our certainties. In both cases it comes down to personal biases.

.
Nope.

It is much easier to fall into a conspiracy minded philosophy and reduce evidence to the inane.

Re: The Tide Turns

Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 11:12 am
by andrewcriddle
juttajxwa wrote:He proved that the Acts of the Apostles was actually written in A.D 638!!
AD 638 is when the Arab invaders took Jerusalem, but the connection escapes me.

Andrew Criddle

Re: The Tide Turns

Posted: Wed Oct 22, 2014 2:17 pm
by DCHindley
andrewcriddle wrote:
juttajxwa wrote:He proved that the Acts of the Apostles was actually written in A.D 638!!
AD 638 is when the Arab invaders took Jerusalem, but the connection escapes me.

Andrew Criddle
It is perhaps a "ghostly" connection?

Re: The Tide Turns

Posted: Fri Oct 24, 2014 9:05 pm
by Peter Kirby
Leucius Charinus wrote:
juttajxwa wrote:He proved that the Acts of the Apostles was actually written in A.D 638!!
Who proved this? Emerson, Lake or Palmer?

Nice first post juttajxwa (I wonder who this is?)
My first assumption is that it is a spammer. Perhaps they're getting more clever. They do seem to be planting accounts to add links on later.