Unless anyone has any evidence to the contrary my research has indicated that the earliest attestation for the word "Christian" χριστιανος is in Codex Alexandrinus, presently dated to the mid 5th century. All earlier attestations in the literary and epigraphic sources were to the term "Chrestian" [χρηστιανος], or in two cases "Chreistian" and once case "Chresian". Until recently I have assumed this attestation in Codex Alexandrinus to also be the first attestation to "Christ" as opposed to "Chrest" (which surprisingly gets most of the airplay in the sources).
AFAIK the letters of John in Vaticanus or Sinaticus do not use the "nomina sacra" form in the following term:
- Strong's Concordance 500. antichristos
antichristos: antichrist, (one who opposes Christ)
Original Word: ἀντίχριστος, ου, ὁ
Part of Speech: Noun, Masculine
Transliteration: antichristos
Phonetic Spelling: (an-tee'-khris-tos)
Short Definition: antichrist
Definition: antichrist, either one who puts himself in the place of, or the enemy (opponent) of the Messiah.
This discovery was actually made possible by mulling over a statement made to blood as follows"
The problem as I see it is that Χριστός actually DOES NOT EXPLICITLY APPEAR in the Bible of the Christians (or "Chrestians") because it is always used in an abbreviated, codified, encrypted, "nomina sacra" scribal form of "XP" or "XC" or "XPC".
Well, I was wrong. Sorry about that blood. Christ Χριστός actually DOES EXPLICITLY APPEAR in the Bible of the Christians in the term "antichrist".
Any comments?
Be well.
LC.