Discussion I am aware of is about Christianity as a religion, but Kampfner notes one thing the hyper rich commonly do, apart from building cities and waging war, is create religions.
There is a very long list - Pharoahs, Darius, Constantine....
Emma Goldman makes a very interesting point
http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Ar ... anity.html
The other thing the hyper rich are commonly superb at is image management....Crassus made sure his myriad slaves were highly trained as architects, lawyers, scribes....The Failure of Christianity
by Emma Goldman
First published in April 1913, in the Mother Earth journal.
The counterfeiters and poisoners of ideas, in their attempt to obscure the line between truth and falsehood, find a valuable ally in the conservatism of language.
Conceptions and words that have long ago lost their original meaning continue through centuries to dominate mankind. Especially is this true if these conceptions have become a common-place, if they have been instilled in our beings from our infancy as great and irrefutable verities. The average mind is easily content with inherited and acquired things, or with the dicta of parents and teachers, because it is much easier to imitate than to create.
Our age has given birth to two intellectual giants, who have undertaken to transvalue the dead social and moral values of the past, especially those contained in Christianity. Friedrich Nietzsche and Max Stirner have hurled blow upon blow against the portals of Christianity, because they saw in it a pernicious slave morality, the denial of life, the destroyer of all the elements that make for strength and character. True, Nietzsche has opposed the slave-morality idea inherent in Christianity in behalf of a master morality for the privileged few. But I venture to suggest that his master idea had nothing to do with the vulgarity of station, caste, or wealth. Rather did it mean the masterful in human possibilities, the masterful in man that would help him to overcome old traditions and worn-out values, so that he may learn to become the creator of new and beautiful things.
Both Nietzsche and Stirner saw in Christianity the leveler of the human race, the breaker of man's will to dare and to do. They saw in every movement built on Christian morality and ethics attempts not at the emancipation from slavery, but for the perpetuation thereof. Hence they opposed these movements with might and main.
Maybe it isn't an example of conspiracy but the normal behaviour of the hyper rich and powerful? Turn the other cheek? Who benefits? Are not religions very interesting money making ventures?
