I have always noticed the same thing about Agrippa. The quick answer of course is to suggest that he was a 'puppet king.' However all the rulers of this period were puppets. The humility goes deeper than this. It is hard to explain. Even a puppet figure could be free to pretend he was the Lord and master of the populace at large. In fact there are numerous figures who are pointed in the period as doing exactly that. I have always found the humility of Agrippa intriguing.Agrippa even adopts coin types celebrating Rome's crushing of the Jewish revolt, such as the well-known Victory inscribing a shield (Fig. 107).170 This is in keeping with Agrippa's military support for the Roman cause. The coin types of both Agrippas are a compendium of expressions of unflinching loyalty to Rome, which goes as far as taking sides against the Jews in the war against Rome. More importantly, the imagery makes direct reference to local cults, namely the Tyche of Caesarea and Pan of Panias (Fig. 105),171 and to the imperial cult. In this respect, Agrippa II goes further than his father while at the same time, he almost eliminates any celebration of his own power. (p. 252)
The Strange Humility Displayed on the Coins of Agrippa II
- stephan happy huller
- Posts: 1480
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 3:06 pm
- Contact:
The Strange Humility Displayed on the Coins of Agrippa II
I note this offhanded observation by Andreas J. M. Kropp in the recently released Images and Monuments of Near Eastern Dynasts, 100 BC - AD 100 (Oxford 2013):
Everyone loves the happy times
- Peter Kirby
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8015
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 2:13 pm
- Location: Santa Clara
- Contact:
Re: The Strange Humility Displayed on the Coins of Agrippa I
Herod Agrippa II: He was friendly (Wikipedia says "intimate") with Josephus, which explains a lot I guess.
"... almost every critical biblical position was earlier advanced by skeptics." - Raymond Brown
Re: The Strange Humility Displayed on the Coins of Agrippa I
"Of course".......who would "Josephus" be portrayed as being friendly with? The latrine cleaner?? The mailman? The local blacksmith...........
Re: The Strange Humility Displayed on the Coins of Agrippa I
Then again, there is already confusion whether the coins identifying an Agrippa II are of him.
http://www.askelm.com/star/star015.htm
The Jewish sources don't identify an Agrippa I or II, just one fellow named Agrippa.
http://www.come-and-hear.com/sotah/sotah_41.html
http://www.askelm.com/star/star015.htm
The Jewish sources don't identify an Agrippa I or II, just one fellow named Agrippa.
http://www.come-and-hear.com/sotah/sotah_41.html
- stephan happy huller
- Posts: 1480
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 3:06 pm
- Contact:
Re: The Strange Humility Displayed on the Coins of Agrippa I
The premise to my ill fated book ...
Everyone loves the happy times
- A_Nony_Mouse
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 3:48 am
Re: The Strange Humility Displayed on the Coins of Agrippa I
Celebrating the victory over the Judeans in coinage sounds exactly like what a Herodian would do.
Go to War of the Jews by Josephus. The Judeans conquered the Idumaeans and forced them on pain of death or banishment to adopt the rituals and taboos of their Yahu cult. The Herods were Idumaeans. Their involvement with the Judean tyrants and "religion" was not voluntary.
When reading Josephus ignore every assumption you might have from the Septuagint as none of them apply to the real history recounted by Josephus. The Judeans even conquered and forced the Galileans to adopt the Yahu cult. Whatever story the NT is telling it is in a backdrop of the conquest and forced conversion and rule by the tyrant priests of Yahu. Obviously Jesus would have hated them. Jesus was a Galilean.
Go to War of the Jews by Josephus. The Judeans conquered the Idumaeans and forced them on pain of death or banishment to adopt the rituals and taboos of their Yahu cult. The Herods were Idumaeans. Their involvement with the Judean tyrants and "religion" was not voluntary.
When reading Josephus ignore every assumption you might have from the Septuagint as none of them apply to the real history recounted by Josephus. The Judeans even conquered and forced the Galileans to adopt the Yahu cult. Whatever story the NT is telling it is in a backdrop of the conquest and forced conversion and rule by the tyrant priests of Yahu. Obviously Jesus would have hated them. Jesus was a Galilean.
The religion of the priests is not the religion of the people.
Priests are just people with skin in the game and an income to lose.
-- The Iron Webmaster
Priests are just people with skin in the game and an income to lose.
-- The Iron Webmaster
Re: The Strange Humility Displayed on the Coins of Agrippa I
And your evidence that "tyrant priests" of Judea "forced" the Galileans to adopt the "Yahu cult" is what exactly?A_Nony_Mouse wrote:
When reading Josephus ignore every assumption you might have from the Septuagint as none of them apply to the real history recounted by Josephus. The Judeans even conquered and forced the Galileans to adopt the Yahu cult. Whatever story the NT is telling it is in a backdrop of the conquest and forced conversion and rule by the tyrant priests of Yahu. Obviously Jesus would have hated them. Jesus was a Galilean.
“The only sensible response to fragmented, slowly but randomly accruing evidence is radical open-mindedness. A single, simple explanation for a historical event is generally a failure of imagination, not a triumph of induction.” William H.C. Propp
- A_Nony_Mouse
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Fri Dec 20, 2013 3:48 am
Re: The Strange Humility Displayed on the Coins of Agrippa I
Josephus, Wars of the Jews. He also recounts the conquest and forced conversion of the Idumaeans (Herod's folks) and the Samaritans. It explains the Judean hatred of those they conquered when they lost control of them with the fall of the Hasmoneans dynasty.Blood wrote:And your evidence that "tyrant priests" of Judea "forced" the Galileans to adopt the "Yahu cult" is what exactly?A_Nony_Mouse wrote:
When reading Josephus ignore every assumption you might have from the Septuagint as none of them apply to the real history recounted by Josephus. The Judeans even conquered and forced the Galileans to adopt the Yahu cult. Whatever story the NT is telling it is in a backdrop of the conquest and forced conversion and rule by the tyrant priests of Yahu. Obviously Jesus would have hated them. Jesus was a Galilean.
Given all the laws, mitzvahs is Orwellian doublespeak, and all the penalties and the power of the priests for summary judgement and execution written into the Septuagint (3000 over the golden calf incident for example) I would say that qualifies as tyranny. There were no appeals from their judgements nor were there independent courts.
Believers don't like Josephus much but we know a bit about Judea when it first appears in history in 67 BC with the arrival of Pompey in the region. What we know from that time and through NT times matches what Josephus describes as the back story. It does not match what is found in the Septuagint. Therefore it is not reasonable to consider the Septuagint superior to Josephus.
The religion of the priests is not the religion of the people.
Priests are just people with skin in the game and an income to lose.
-- The Iron Webmaster
Priests are just people with skin in the game and an income to lose.
-- The Iron Webmaster
Re: The Strange Humility Displayed on the Coins of Agrippa I
Acts 12 depicts Agrippa as being anything but humble when perhaps being proclaimed a messiah ( or speaking with the voice of a god) by the people.stephan happy huller wrote:I note this offhanded observation by Andreas J. M. Kropp in the recently released Images and Monuments of Near Eastern Dynasts, 100 BC - AD 100 (Oxford 2013):
I have always noticed the same thing about Agrippa. The quick answer of course is to suggest that he was a 'puppet king.' However all the rulers of this period were puppets. The humility goes deeper than this. It is hard to explain. Even a puppet figure could be free to pretend he was the Lord and master of the populace at large. In fact there are numerous figures who are pointed in the period as doing exactly that. I have always found the humility of Agrippa intriguing.Agrippa even adopts coin types celebrating Rome's crushing of the Jewish revolt, such as the well-known Victory inscribing a shield (Fig. 107).170 This is in keeping with Agrippa's military support for the Roman cause. The coin types of both Agrippas are a compendium of expressions of unflinching loyalty to Rome, which goes as far as taking sides against the Jews in the war against Rome. More importantly, the imagery makes direct reference to local cults, namely the Tyche of Caesarea and Pan of Panias (Fig. 105),171 and to the imperial cult. In this respect, Agrippa II goes further than his father while at the same time, he almost eliminates any celebration of his own power. (p. 252)
And upon a set day Herod, arrayed in royal apparel, sat upon his throne, and made an oration unto them. And the people gave a shout, saying, It is the voice of a god, and not of a man. And immediately the angel of the Lord smote him, because he gave not God the glory: and he was eaten of worms, and gave up the ghost.
- stephan happy huller
- Posts: 1480
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 3:06 pm
- Contact:
Re: The Strange Humility Displayed on the Coins of Agrippa I
But acts 12 isn't about Agrippa II
Everyone loves the happy times