A great limit I see in K. Hanhardt's Open Tomb is that, in polemic with Crossan's view that the Gospel of Peter precedes someway Mark, he denies the possibility that a so anti-Judaic Gospel could precede the more philo-Judaic Mark.
Among all the arguments in support of Markan priority, this is surely the more irrational.
Karel Hanhart on the Gospel of Peter
Karel Hanhart on the Gospel of Peter
Last edited by Giuseppe on Sat Jan 13, 2018 11:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.
-
Kunigunde Kreuzerin
- Posts: 2110
- Joined: Sat Nov 16, 2013 2:19 pm
- Location: Leipzig, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Karen Hanhardt on the Gospel of Peter
.
just a nitpick
it's Karel Hanhart
just a nitpick
it's Karel Hanhart
-
Secret Alias
- Posts: 18662
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am
Re: Karen Hanhardt on the Gospel of Peter
Looks sort of like Larry David
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
Re: Karen Hanhardt on the Gospel of Peter
Giuseppe,Giuseppe wrote: ↑Mon Jan 08, 2018 8:14 am A great limit I see in K. Hanhardt's Open Tomb is that, in polemic with Crossan's view that the Gospel of Peter precedes someway Mark, he denies the possibility that a so anti-Judaic Gospel could precede the more philo-Judaic Mark.
Among all the arguments in support of Markan priority, this is surely the more irrational.
Did you know that you can correct a mistyped subject heading by just changing the subject banner of your original post?
