Gerasene Swine (again) as Gentiles

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
Post Reply
Giuseppe
Posts: 6508
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:37 am
Location: Italy

Gerasene Swine (again) as Gentiles

Post by Giuseppe » Wed Apr 10, 2019 12:45 am


He lived among the tombs. And no one could constrain him, not even with chains, ....
6 But when he saw Jesus afar off, he ran up and kneeled before Him, 7 and cried out with a loud voice

(Mark 5:3,6)

The gerasene man is just risen, since he is going out the tombs, symbol of the Exile. "Ger" in "Gerasene" means "foreign". A new Joshua is came to give him the new Law (the garment).

But the gerasene is possessed by Romans (the "Legion"). So the demons abandon the Gerasene and go (really: return) to the Gentiles, the "swine".

But where are the "swine" from? In Luke the gerasene exits from a "city": Urbs, Rome.

a man of the city who had demons met him.

So the Gentiles from Rome, by drowning in the sea of baptism, are freed by the demons leading them.
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.

User avatar
arnoldo
Posts: 830
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 6:10 pm
Location: Latin America

Re: Gerasene Swine (again) as Gentiles

Post by arnoldo » Wed Apr 10, 2019 3:07 pm

Congratulations on having 5145 posts. . . within a few years perhaps you'll reach 10,000 posts.

Giuseppe
Posts: 6508
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:37 am
Location: Italy

Re: Gerasene Swine (again) as Gentiles

Post by Giuseppe » Thu Apr 11, 2019 1:01 am

arnoldo wrote:
Wed Apr 10, 2019 3:07 pm
Congratulations on having 5145 posts. . . within a few years perhaps you'll reach 10,000 posts.
Does this affect you someway?
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.

Giuseppe
Posts: 6508
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:37 am
Location: Italy

Re: Gerasene Swine (again) as Gentiles

Post by Giuseppe » Thu Apr 11, 2019 9:12 am


When the angels wished to sing a chant of joy because the Egyptians were destroyed in the sea, God said to them: My creatures are drowned, and would ye sing?

(Talmud, Sanhedrim, 39b)
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.

User avatar
DCHindley
Posts: 2761
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:53 am
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: Gerasene Swine (again) as Gentiles

Post by DCHindley » Thu Apr 11, 2019 6:20 pm

Not sure I agree with your etymology, giuseppe.

Besides, the safety of the reading Gerasene is shaky, although the scene could have occurred in the geographical vicinity of that town due to the steep slope to the Lake of Galilee.

Since all the towns of the Decapolis region were established by Alexander the Great and the Greek successors to him as Greek style city-states (the polis), where they settled the veterans of their armies, I do not believe that any of them were placed at previously established Syrian towns. So, we can largely rule out an Aramaic or Hebrew etymology. My guess for the name Gerasa for this Greek colony would be the Greek word GE (= ground) plus RHIZA (root). Or simply GERAS (old age). Basically: "Place of Retirement" or "A good place to plant roots." Naturally, if they are to farm the land granted to the polis, they have to plant grain in the earth. The possibilities are, it seems, endless.

My own suggestion, made many moons ago on Crosstalk2, was the account is roughly based on the following passage:
Wars of the Jews 2:503-506 wrote: wrote:
503 so Cestius took part of his forces and marched hastily to Zebulun, a strong city of Galilee, which was called the City of Men, and divides the country of Ptolemais from our nation; 504 this he found deserted by its men, the multitude having fled to the mountains, but full of all sorts of good things; those he allowed the soldiers to plunder, and set fire to the city, although it was of admirable beauty, and had its houses built like those in Tyre, and Sidon, and Berytus. 505 After this he overran all the country, and seized upon whatever came in his way, and set fire to the villages that were around them, and then returned to Ptolemais. 506 But when the Syrians, and especially those of Berytus, were busy in plundering, the Jews pulled up their courage again, for they knew that Cestius had retired, and attacked those who were left behind unexpectedly, and killed about two thousand of them.
This Zebulun would presumably have existed in the mountain region between Ptolemais (on the Mediterranean Sea) and the Sea of Galilee (and thus be on exactly the opposite side of the Sea of Galilee than Gadara or Gerasa, probably in fact not far from Jotapata or Asochis).

I suggested that this rout was perceived in a manner similar to the way the Arab PLO nationalists used to speak of "pushing the Jews back into the sea" in the 1970s, except here it was Roman forces being pushed back to the shores of the Mediterranean Sea. Granted the soldiers were Roman auxiliaries, not legionnaires, but when boasting, folks do tend to exaggerate.

IMHO, have here (in Gospel of Mark) a remnant of Judean propaganda from the first rebellion of 66-74 CE. If Jesus' death was a real one, and actually occurred in the times of Pilate, I do think that it is possible that the later events of the Judean War had somehow affected the telling of his story.

DCH

Charles Wilson
Posts: 1332
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 8:13 am

Re: Gerasene Swine (again) as Gentiles

Post by Charles Wilson » Sat Apr 13, 2019 8:01 am

Thank you, DCH.

I'm always looking for rewritten Source Stories and you may be right.
With the rewritten Source Stories in the NT there is generally a word or phrase that acts as a pointer to the Original.

Mark 5:15 (RSV):

[15] And they came to Jesus, and saw the demoniac sitting there, clothed and in his right mind, the man who had had the legion; and they were afraid.

"...clothed and in his right mind..."

I take this as a pointer to the Priesthood - The Lunatic is of the Priestly Groups - and the "Jesus" character is telling him to go back to his Priestly Group and to return to the Culture Wars in the Decapolis. This is very much an inversion of meaning for the Transvalued version we have here.

I will examine your suggestion closely. There may be a Key Word. I thank you for the suggestion!

CW

Post Reply