Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
- Posts: 2828
- Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:37 am
- Location: Vicenza (Italy)
There appear to be references to journeys to India. This may alter dialogue with Buddhism completely, not to mention Hinduism. And there may be further controversial material about marriage, much in the news now days.
When I first read the Doherty's book JNGNM
, my conclusion was that only if Q
was discovered, then his Case could be questioned (and I would be again historicist), given the clear difficulties shown by Doherty in harmonizing Q
with Paul (remember that Richard Carrier denies Q
did exist, it's impossible to ignore the pure and simple possibility that a historical Jesus
said these sayings.
This is my reaction when I have listened the notice this afternoon.
And which is your first reaction?
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.
- Posts: 8020
- Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am
I don't know how to tell you this Giuseppe but ... April Fool's!
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ben C. Smith, Charles Wilson, Giuseppe, Google [Bot], iskander, Jax, Joseph D. L., lsayre, Peter Kirby, Secret Alias, Yahoo [Bot] and 79 guests