Archeologists Find Q

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.

Archeologists Find Q

Postby Giuseppe » Fri Apr 01, 2016 6:07 am

There appear to be references to journeys to India. This may alter dialogue with Buddhism completely, not to mention Hinduism. And there may be further controversial material about marriage, much in the news now days.

When I first read the Doherty's book JNGNM, my conclusion was that only if Q was discovered, then his Case could be questioned (and I would be again historicist), given the clear difficulties shown by Doherty in harmonizing Q with Paul (remember that Richard Carrier denies Q).

If Q did exist, it's impossible to ignore the pure and simple possibility that a historical Jesus said these sayings.

This is my reaction when I have listened the notice this afternoon.

And which is your first reaction?
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:37 am
Location: Italia


by »


Re: Archeologists Find Q

Postby Secret Alias » Fri Apr 01, 2016 7:42 am

I don't know how to tell you this Giuseppe but ... April Fool's!
“Finally, from so little sleeping and so much reading, his brain dried up and he went completely out of his mind.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Saavedra, Don Quixote
User avatar
Secret Alias
Posts: 7005
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am

Re: Archeologists Find Q

Postby Ken Olson » Fri Apr 01, 2016 10:18 am

Stephen Carlson, "Lost Q Document Found in Cave," Synoptic-L List, April 1, 2003: ... opics/9180

Nathan Eubank, "Breaking: Lead Codices Revealed to be the Q Document," Duke Newt (Duke New Testament) Blog, April 1, 2011: ... -be-q.html
Ken Olson
Posts: 57
Joined: Fri May 09, 2014 9:26 am


by »


Return to Christian Texts and History

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aleph One, Ben C. Smith, Google [Bot], JoeWallack, lsayre, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 60 guests