Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

Secret Alias wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 7:43 am No.

That’s what i read in the Pauline epistles.
But well, another maniac marcionite prioricist. Will not waste my time.

Secret Alias wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 7:39 am Not the same thing as wanting judaism to disappear.

Paul wrote for the gentiles.

Any Judaism. The destruction and disappearance of the Jewish halakhah is however surprisingly never a feature of Jewish sects. The Pharisees themselves didn't ask pagans to circumcise or follow kosher customs. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah The pauline epistles were intented for...

Secret Alias wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 7:13 am Paul's core beliefs are alien to Judaism.

Which ones ? And which judaism ?

Could some, much, most or even all the accounts of Paul be accounts about Marcion? or mostly about a Marcionite? The shipping expeditions, etc,? The references to other teachings may be references to subsequent orthodox teachers? Even Peter and James (& John) - who Paul disses - may represent o...

Joel Marcus - The way of the Lord was an important work on Mark’s use of the Old Testament and the jewish messianic expectations fulfilled in Mark.

But still waiting for a definitive book on this subject.

Im waiting too for a definitive book on Mark’s use of the Pauline epistles.

I think at present there are more that agree with Goodacre that Luke used Matthew than argue the reverse (Matthean Poteriority Hypothesis or MPH) that Matthew used Luke, though the number arguing for Matthean posteriority has grown considerably in the last decade or so. I think I could could appeal...

No Jewish or Persian text has questioned the existence of Esther, who was presented as the wife of the great Emperor Xerxes. Yet there is no debate about Esther's non-historicity. If you can invent an emperor's wife without any historian questioning her existence, then you can easily invent a Galile...

I assume that Ken is saying that Luke interpreted Mark as an adoptionist text Yes, you're probably right. Sorry, I wrote a reply but it seems to have disappeared into cyberspace. I'm not arguing that Mark intended to imply that Jesus became the Son of God by adoption. I'm arguing that Matthew and L...

Giuseppe wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2024 12:54 pm I assume that Ken is saying that Luke interpreted Mark as an adoptionist text

Yes, you're probably right.