Search found 507 matches
- Fri May 03, 2024 12:00 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Possible textual evidence that Mark came after Matthew?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 355
Re: Possible textual evidence that Mark came after Matthew?
If Mark were retouched that much, im wondering why Joseph is completely absent from the story. Yeah, I think that's the difficulty, is trying to understand or explain the entire editorial framework. Why would an editor do X but not Y? And this issue has caused many people to assume that because a s...
- Thu May 02, 2024 5:35 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Possible textual evidence that Mark came after Matthew?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 355
Re: Possible textual evidence that Mark came after Matthew?
I have no doubt that Mark was revised in the presence of Matthew, so yes, parts of Mark were written after Matthew and conformed to Matthew. The real problem here is that people keep thinking of these as actually independent works that are purely preserved in their original form. NOTHING in the New...
- Thu May 02, 2024 3:06 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Possible textual evidence that Mark came after Matthew?
- Replies: 17
- Views: 355
Re: Possible textual evidence that Mark came after Matthew?
How can Jesus be the Son of God if he had a biological father ? That’s Mark theology so Jesus is literally the Son of God in Mark.
Matthew, who is a little less subtle, seeks to meet Jewish expectations by including a father in the story. Yes, Jesus had a biological father of Davidic descent.
Matthew, who is a little less subtle, seeks to meet Jewish expectations by including a father in the story. Yes, Jesus had a biological father of Davidic descent.
- Sat Apr 27, 2024 7:46 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Gospel priority
- Replies: 126
- Views: 18046
Re: Gospel priority
I favor the Farrer theory, that Luke used Matthew (as Farrer, Goulder, and Goodacre). Given that the Farrer theory proposes the Lucan writers had a copy of Mt, Ken, why would they have used Mk at all, when Mt had double the content and in better Greek? Would you propose something like, "well, ...
- Wed Apr 24, 2024 4:04 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Gospel priority
- Replies: 126
- Views: 18046
Re: Gospel priority
I had lunch with Mark Goodacre yesterday and we talked about John and the synoptics, which is what he is currently working on. I’m been waiting for this book for more than 4 years now. It was planned to be released in 2021 :D I liked his article : John's Use of Matthean/Lukan Redaction of Mark – Ma...
- Wed Apr 24, 2024 3:51 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Is *Ev more paulinist than Mark?
- Replies: 8
- Views: 215
Re: Is *Ev more paulinist than Mark?
- Sun Apr 07, 2024 7:49 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Was Paul Marcion (in part, at least)?
- Replies: 27
- Views: 585
Re: Was Paul Marcion (in part, at least)?
That’s what i read in the Pauline epistles.
But well, another maniac marcionite prioricist. Will not waste my time.
- Sun Apr 07, 2024 7:41 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Was Paul Marcion (in part, at least)?
- Replies: 27
- Views: 585
Re: Was Paul Marcion (in part, at least)?
Paul wrote for the gentiles.
- Sun Apr 07, 2024 7:38 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Was Paul Marcion (in part, at least)?
- Replies: 27
- Views: 585
Re: Was Paul Marcion (in part, at least)?
Any Judaism. The destruction and disappearance of the Jewish halakhah is however surprisingly never a feature of Jewish sects. The Pharisees themselves didn't ask pagans to circumcise or follow kosher customs. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah The pauline epistles were intented for...
- Sun Apr 07, 2024 7:29 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Was Paul Marcion (in part, at least)?
- Replies: 27
- Views: 585
Re: Was Paul Marcion (in part, at least)?
Which ones ? And which judaism ?