Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

I favor the Farrer theory, that Luke used Matthew (as Farrer, Goulder, and Goodacre). Given that the Farrer theory proposes the Lucan writers had a copy of Mt, Ken, why would they have used Mk at all, when Mt had double the content and in better Greek? Would you propose something like, "well, ...

I had lunch with Mark Goodacre yesterday and we talked about John and the synoptics, which is what he is currently working on. I’m been waiting for this book for more than 4 years now. It was planned to be released in 2021 :D I liked his article : John's Use of Matthean/Lukan Redaction of Mark – Ma...

MrMacSon wrote: ↑Tue Apr 23, 2024 11:48 pm

Giuseppe wrote: ↑Tue Apr 23, 2024 9:46 pm If Mark is not Paulinist, then the next question is:

• What dumb jerk thinks Mark is not 'Paulinist'?
  • see viewtopic.php?p=159661#p159661

• The most pertinent question might be: what text, besides Acts of the Apostles, might be as Paulinist as Mark?

Exact.

Secret Alias wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 7:43 am No.

That’s what i read in the Pauline epistles.
But well, another maniac marcionite prioricist. Will not waste my time.

Secret Alias wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 7:39 am Not the same thing as wanting judaism to disappear.

Paul wrote for the gentiles.

Any Judaism. The destruction and disappearance of the Jewish halakhah is however surprisingly never a feature of Jewish sects. The Pharisees themselves didn't ask pagans to circumcise or follow kosher customs. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Laws_of_Noah The pauline epistles were intented for...

Secret Alias wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 7:13 am Paul's core beliefs are alien to Judaism.

Which ones ? And which judaism ?

Could some, much, most or even all the accounts of Paul be accounts about Marcion? or mostly about a Marcionite? The shipping expeditions, etc,? The references to other teachings may be references to subsequent orthodox teachers? Even Peter and James (& John) - who Paul disses - may represent o...

Joel Marcus - The way of the Lord was an important work on Mark’s use of the Old Testament and the jewish messianic expectations fulfilled in Mark.

But still waiting for a definitive book on this subject.

Im waiting too for a definitive book on Mark’s use of the Pauline epistles.

I think at present there are more that agree with Goodacre that Luke used Matthew than argue the reverse (Matthean Poteriority Hypothesis or MPH) that Matthew used Luke, though the number arguing for Matthean posteriority has grown considerably in the last decade or so. I think I could could appeal...