Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

Giuseppe wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2024 4:55 am

In Mark, the voice from heaven at the baptism and the Parable of the Vineyard.

+ Mark 1:1
+ Mark 3:11
+ Mark 5:7
+ Mark 9:7
+ Mark 14:61-62
+ Mark 15:39

I don't think that the fact that Mark specifies that this is a fulfillment of the Scriptures is enough to make this verse a late interpolation to follow Matthew's model. On the contrary, one could say that it was Mark's verse that inspired Matthew to add more throughout his text With Mark what is l...

If Mark were retouched that much, im wondering why Joseph is completely absent from the story. Yeah, I think that's the difficulty, is trying to understand or explain the entire editorial framework. Why would an editor do X but not Y? And this issue has caused many people to assume that because a s...

I have no doubt that Mark was revised in the presence of Matthew, so yes, parts of Mark were written after Matthew and conformed to Matthew. The real problem here is that people keep thinking of these as actually independent works that are purely preserved in their original form. NOTHING in the New...

How can Jesus be the Son of God if he had a biological father ? That’s Mark theology so Jesus is literally the Son of God in Mark.

Matthew, who is a little less subtle, seeks to meet Jewish expectations by including a father in the story. Yes, Jesus had a biological father of Davidic descent.

I favor the Farrer theory, that Luke used Matthew (as Farrer, Goulder, and Goodacre). Given that the Farrer theory proposes the Lucan writers had a copy of Mt, Ken, why would they have used Mk at all, when Mt had double the content and in better Greek? Would you propose something like, "well, ...

I had lunch with Mark Goodacre yesterday and we talked about John and the synoptics, which is what he is currently working on. I’m been waiting for this book for more than 4 years now. It was planned to be released in 2021 :D I liked his article : John's Use of Matthean/Lukan Redaction of Mark – Ma...

MrMacSon wrote: ↑Tue Apr 23, 2024 11:48 pm

Giuseppe wrote: ↑Tue Apr 23, 2024 9:46 pm If Mark is not Paulinist, then the next question is:

• What dumb jerk thinks Mark is not 'Paulinist'?
  • see viewtopic.php?p=159661#p159661

• The most pertinent question might be: what text, besides Acts of the Apostles, might be as Paulinist as Mark?

Exact.

Secret Alias wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 7:43 am No.

That’s what i read in the Pauline epistles.
But well, another maniac marcionite prioricist. Will not waste my time.

Secret Alias wrote: ↑Sun Apr 07, 2024 7:39 am Not the same thing as wanting judaism to disappear.

Paul wrote for the gentiles.