Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

Forensic document examiners have a genuine area of expertise. For example, here is a 450 page monograph based on empirical studies, involving collecting data about handwriting, that documents characteristics of disguised writing: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/20535754.pdf As an area of expertise, ...

At the time that Tselikas was asked for his expert opinion as a paleographer, and by the same people (BAR), the professional forensic document examiner Venetia Anastasopoulou was simultaneously being asked to publish. https://www.biblicalarchaeology.org/wp-content/uploads/secret-mark-handwriting-res...

I made an earlier post in a similar thread here To paraphrase: Tselikas did not strictly speaking establish that the handwriting is later than the 18th century, What Tselikas did claim to establish is that although the handwriting is in one sense an 18th century Greek cursive, the scribe is not wri...

The Mar Saba letter has the plural here (iota, not sigma): https://earlywritings.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=169090#p169090 https://earlywritings.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=169661#p169661 https://earlywritings.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=169711#p169711 So the question of how Morton Smith interpreted the ...

SA, for clarity, Smith's Greek text is a "transcription" and an error there would be transcribed incorrectly.

Which is a somewhat more relevant point than just saying mistranslated.

There's something to this. But we ought to think in a general way about every parable, the interpretation of which has not been recorded by the evangelists, even though Jesus explained all things to His own disciples privately; [Mark 4:34] According to Heine's translation: "But someone will obj...

I am merely giving my opinion, Peter, that, given the huge publicity about this, that some reader would have found it, were it extant. That is apparently different than your opinion. OK, two opinions, then. I am not accusing you of dishonesty, and I hope the same applies to me. Thanks. I appreciate...

StephenGoranson wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:55 am If a pre-1976 monastic publication has that, by 2024, would not someone by now have found it?

So why would I ask these questions? Because I am dishonest and refuse to admit the obvious that it must not exist?

All your posting on the subject has documented conclusively that the Gospel of Mark is not anti-Marcionite.

Take a bow.

WRONG! It's not clear enough to settle a debate with a Basilidian. It is clear enough to settle a debate with a Marcionite . Please like the difference. No. How can you answer 'no'? We are said that Marcion interpreted ad litteram the OT. The allegorical expedient was not available to him. It was u...