Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

Dave Allen's path to the reconstruction of TF led through Jesus the Zealot, proposed by SGF Brandon, developed by Fernando Burmejo-Rubio and commercially used by Reza Aslan. Over time, Dave focused on the literature itself by Josephus. Dave paid particular attention to the literary constructs used b...

TF is legit for Poles. Dubarle reconstruction

Luke sondergut was developed throughout the period of creation under the influence of others up to the canonical text. The same for Mark and Matthew. They wrote together or used Teams

None of the synoptic gospels is a homogeneous work - they all contain content from different authors. Klinghardt argues that the homogeneous text is *Ev and that it was written by a single previously unrecognized author who wrote in a manner most reminiscent of Luke but sometimes resembles the style...

Giuseppe wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 11:04 pm

JarekS wrote: ↑Tue May 07, 2024 10:56 pm Ev was written by Luke and Matthew

for me it is an unacceptable conclusion.

Klinghardt or Harnack?

the problem is the syntax of the reconstruction language. Klinghardt creates strange structures in koine to create a unique language for the new ghostwriter. This is not my conclusion, but linguists' conclusion. Ev was written by Luke and Matthew

This is Vinzent's problem - he deals with side issues and avoids real problems. The only significant problem of this Vinzent-Trobisch-Klinghardt environment is to indicate and prove that *Ev, which Marcion used, is a homogeneous publication of another ghostwriter. The only major problem. Nothing is ...

Just short info
https://www.bn.org.pl/aktualnosci/4789- ... -nprh.html

The greatest enemies are the internal enemies in your own camp. If it's such a terrible truth, why do you describe Marcion with the voice of his bitter enemies? The voice of his bitter enemies is the only voice Marcion has left:-) From this voice we can distill just a few useful pieces of informati...

Great article and I agree with that. Moreover, it is evident that biblical scholars are beginning to insist on the thesis that Josephus' writings were known to Luke. The dating of the Acts is currently moved to the years 100-150CE. A few years ago I found a piece by Dave Allen on JHC(Journal of High...