Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

this is a very difficult to understand discussion

4 And that he was buried, and that he rose again the third day according to the scriptures:

everyday there would have been a death and there would've been burial too. this is common knowledge. it does not say that the tomb was discovered.

The entire point of going to see the tomb and find it empty is precisely the example number 78 of a long list of 77 body translation examples found in pagan literature. the women go to the wrong place, they will not see appearance in the wrong place. and when they leave their lack of faith causes t...

"Thew was no tomb for a historical Jesus ---> there was no empty tomb for a historical Jesus." when i read the last verse in mark 16 i always told myself that the women and the tomb are not important to the author, the author says "...he is on his way to a location 70 miles away"...

god is not the author of confusion?

why are you calling "ar rajul"

"al rasul" in your title ?

i thought "the man" = ar rajul

i saw a program on nat geo about marian apparitions

my prediction is that in a hundred years from now mary could become the 4th member of trinity.

paul didnt say that they checked.

It seems to me that an investigator could go to check Paul's and the gospels' claims. He could ask the Romans if guards were at the tomb, and could go around asking about the appearance to the 500. Maybe this was not a simultaneous appearance to 500, but an appearance to 500 individually at differe...

when yalad is used for yhwh how would the semitic mind understand this word ? why is the koran using the SAME root and denying yalad for god ?