Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

The Jewish apocalyptic Paul only exists in post-marcionite forgeries and interpolations.

Josephus is a century too early for writing that late piecemeal.

Of course, Lk does not use those gospels but common prior sources.

Seeing Mark as Pauline is an error of those who believe in Markkan Prioritism and Pauline Authenticism. Others know that both the epistles and the gospels are late piecemeal, and their relative connections are toop abstruse to fit into any hilariously simplicistic template.

The Matthean sayings are Judaizations and degradations of gnostic pre-Christian dogmatics. Apologists like Gryan fail to understand that.

The strong man is the demiurge.

The question is hilariously stupid beyond imaginability as both epistles are corruptions of prior scribbles.

All Pauline authenticists are infinitely crazy, as are the Markan prioritists; and Carrier falls for both naive doctrines.

The passion story is not the key, the feeding miracles are.

This denial derives from Sabaoth's denial of his archon family, as described in Hypostasis of the Archons. Apologists like Kreuzigerin fail to understand this connection.