Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

Apologists like JohnT fail malevolently to see that the insertion of the commandments is antimarcionist interpolation, tailored to identify illogically the Father with the god of the Old Testament. Others recognize the judaization that has been going on in the history of the evolution from pre-Chris...

Jean Magne proved the lateness of teh Markan version in JESUS DEVANT PILATE, linked here recentl;y by Giuseppe.

The whole commandments drivel is a late and impious interpolation by Judaizers, anyways.

In any case the brother-of-the-lord drivel is a late interpolation.

Barabbas is originally introduced only as a renowned prisoner. The insurrection and murder is a later addition.

Huparchon is not simply about being, as apologists try to force mankind to believe; but it is about the primordial essence. So Jesus was of divine shape from the beginning. The same way, huparchon is used in Gal 2:14 and in 1 Co 11:7, as well as in Acts.

Origen was too obtuse to understand Celsus and the Ophitic diagram.

This is but appropriation of the baptism using midrash on the role of water in the NT; but it cannot be used by apologists like Kreuzerin and their ilk against the origin in legends like Corpus Hermeticum IV about the pool of intellect.

The shema are an excessively late, anti-marcionist interpolation, proving once more the falsity of Markan prioritism.

This proves once morte the falsity of Markan Prioritism, for overall more consequently Jewish Mt does not identify God as a creator although certainly thinking so.