Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

Jesus is here of course identified with Sabaoth, Son of Yaldabaoth.

Looking for the beast in Roman history is vain and naive. The beast must be sought among the heresies of second century and their doctrines.

Revelation is a completely Catholic text, as it identifies the Father with YHWH, in opposition to Satan identified with the serpent . The Catholic church identifies itself as the true and restored Israel, recepient of the promise to rule the world in turn for its allegiance with YHWH.

Revelation is nowhere near primitive but a complicated construction provided by an establishing Roman Catholic church.

Paul is entirey fictional, whence any comparison to typical whatsoever people is pointless.

All those questions are self-created problems of uncritical scholars, specifically Markan prioritists . By recognizing the need of lost sources, those disappear like ice in the sunshine.

Isn't Proverbs enough to explain Philo's attitude here?

The correct date is never, as the gospel story is pure fiction.

Arius is a figment of the hallucination of naive eccles`iastic historians.

The parable is pure Judaization par excellence, as it identifies The Father and YHWH.