Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

That religious site is probably rore-sanctifica.org , belonging to schismatics of the second Vaticanum. JM had once demonstrated that the assumed document used since the late sixties for the inauguration for new Roman Catholic bishops is not what it pretends; which prompted the schismatics to celebr...

The involvement of the Jews is a late interpolation, as proven by Jean Magne in LA CRUCIFIXION: POLEMIQUE ANTI-JUIVE ET MYTHE GNOSTIQUE. Markan priorists are not able to understand it.

Lost hypothetical sources are necessary and only denied by intellectually lazy people like Goodacre. Documents get lost easily if out of usage, not bound in codices , or similar. It happened all the time. Complicated things like the synoptics require complicated solutions, no matter what Ockhamists ...

Of course they must derive from a common source. I do not fall for the excuses of Markan prioritists.

The demiurge is the god of the Tanakh.

The withering fig tree is already in the source shared with Mt; it is not Markan invention. A reprise demonstrates that the episode in the temple was interrupted artificially by Mark to accomodate part of the fig tree story.

The passage in FJ is fraudulent forgery, so it cannot be used for the origins of rthe gospel story. John is nothing but a Judaization of the keryx of baptism found also in CH IV, the Monad and the Crater. He is introduced before Jesus because the baptise, the acquisition of the intellect, must prece...

The epistle of James is purely Catholic homiletics and not Jewish by any stretch; further, the unction of the infirm is a Catholic thing, not a Jewish one. Further, so-called Jewish Christianity is but an exaggeration of Catholicism into the Judaizing direction, not a precursor as apologists try to ...

With or without Marcion, Paul's received epistles fully depend on Roman Catholicism as they identify illogically YHWH and The Father; further, even the marcionic version depends on themes only created in the process the conscious rejection of the properly gnostic exegesis of genesis 3, which could n...

There is no continuity between Essenism and Christianity, as Essenism is vigorously pro-law while Christianity undermines law in a however subtle manner.

John B has nothing to do with Essenes as he is just dogmatic fiction of Judaizers.