Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

The Catholic redactor does not make that argument, but redactorial fatigue shows that this had been the original assumption of Pseudo-Paul.

Docetism predated Christianity.

That's Carrier's problem but no problerm for mythicism.

GRS Mead described already in Fragments of a Faith Forgotten that Epiphanes is an Euhemerization of the reapperaring moon.

Paul shows traces of editorial fatigue of anti-marcionite redaction, as demonstrated by Hermann Detering in Der Gefaelschte Paulus.

The Catholic doctrine is only hypocritically defending the demiurge while at the same time not interested in keeping YHWH's laws. Rather, they just attempt to sell their activity in the department of stretching and bending law as a proper understanding of the prophesies of the Old Testament. The nam...

Paul is late patristic dogmatic piecemeal fiction and only believed genuine by uncritical scholars and apologists.

No, accretion works blatantly against Markan priority, as there are many Markan additions to pericopes known by Luke or Mattthew.

Baptism derves from the hermetic doctrine of the baptism in the crater, a metaphorical description of the acquisition of the nous, and "John" euhemerizes the herald (keryx) of the baptism, sent by the Father. As a sacrament, it effects the conversion (metanoia) from worship of the rulers o...

The consensus is absurdly false, as almost everything in NT scholarship. Of course, Philemon is nowhere near original but corrupted piecemeal like all epistles.

Only Stuart G. Waugh has hitherto been able to appraise Philemon in a non-hypocritical and non-superstitious manner.