Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

I am indebted to Secret Alias ​​for providing this detailed analysis showing a specific stage of development of Anti-Marcionist Propaganda. The best title has already been used by Judith Lieu who in her book Making of a Heretic best reflects the specific development of this propaganda over a longer ...

???? The goal of the project was to find common source and solve synoptic problem. He started with protoMark theory. The same result was obtained by Burkett or Boismard. Single protoMark is not a solution. So what is your problem?

Klinghardt went through both paths - priority of Mark and priority of *Ev. Analyzing priority of Mark he came to proto-Mark A and proto-Mark B Where does Klinghardt write about this proto-Mark A and proto-Mark B? I don't know if he wrote it that way. I think I heard it as part of some public discus...

Recently even Vincent has begun to doubt the homogeneity of *Ev, which he expressed on his blog. the *Ev's priority is in terms of knowledge , not in terms of existence . Did Marcion wrote his Gospel from oral material or redacted it from earlier collections? - my change of mind. Markus Vinzent. ht...

I don't know if he wrote it that way. I think I heard it as part of some public discussion about Klinghardt's reconstruction. Trobisch blurted out that they couldn't propose proto Mark in one edition to be a common source for Luke and Matthew. Something like that. A and B is used in Boismard's and B...

Composite of texts from ghostwriters identified as Luke and Matthew.

*Ev is a composite of texts from Luke and Matthew and is the first gospel of the synoptic group. Egerton 2 clearly shows that the synoptics worked together.

All my posts have described what I will give in bullet points. 1. Marcion was the first leader of orthodoxy to combine content based on revelation with myths about the historical Jesus. 2. *Ev was the first product of the synoptic team. 3. Luke/Acts was the last product of the team to include the te...

Secret Alias wrote: ↑Fri Aug 23, 2024 12:26 pm He's probably right.

He gave good arguments

under the Markan priority, we have the euhemerization of YHWH by using a man (Jesus). Hence Tite's argument works: the character is there , therefore he existed. And Markan priority is a good theory. Klinghardt went through both paths - priority of Mark and priority of *Ev. Analyzing priority of Ma...