Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

The issue of fundamentalist verses troll must be decided by something we talk a lot about here, Provenance (not "providunce"). Your posting history here shows high quantity and low quality which is evidence you want reaction and not research = troll. Show me where you have posted in a Chr...

So for starters you first have to convince me that you are a Fundamentalist. Your screen name does not help to do that unless you can also convince me that you really do believe there is a war on Christians here and being anonymous helps protect you from harm. (What the hell does a war on Christian...

Thanks, obviously you know the joke. JW : Probably my second favorite thing about Forums like this after my immediately being a superior Bible scholar to any Christian Bible scholar who has ever lived simply because I accept that the Impossible is not possible are the Screen Names which reference o...

Thanks, obviously you know the joke. JW : Probably my second favorite thing about Forums like this after my immediately being a superior Bible scholar to any Christian Bible scholar who has ever lived simply because I accept that the Impossible is not possible are the Screen Names which reference o...

Tonto Goldstein wrote:

JW:
Like the screen name Bubba.


Joseph

ErrancyWiki

The Tale Wagging The Dogma. Which "Mark" Wrote GMark? A Dear John Letter The Marks Brothers (of the Lord) In my Thread here: Jesus SportsGospel Line in the Sands-Odds that GMark post 70 proponents of pre 70 are having [understatement]a difficult time [/understatement] trying to articulate...

Mark "I Am IronyMan". How Much Ironic Contrast, Transfer and Reversal Did He kraM? The purpose of this Thread will be to explore the use of irony in GMarK. I have faith that I became the foremost authority the world has ever known on the use of irony in GMark some time ago. The offending ...

That being said, getting this party of God started, very generally, the External evidence favors GMark pre-70 while the Internal evidence favors GMark post-70. I hereby set the initial conclusion that GMark was substantially intially written...70 = How do you know that the thing is internal evidenc...

Be Afraid. Be Very Afraid For. Like Father, like Son. F(ing)LY 2. Confirmation 16:8 Original Ending JW : Arguing that the original ending of GMark was likely lost seems to be a popular pastor time of Christian Bible Scholarship (CBS). Here is the latest to try and make resurrection sighting the ear...

JW : Speaking of odd(s): The 'First Century' Gospel of Mark, Josh McDowell, and Mummy Masks: What They All Have in Common In this video (posted below), McDowell explicitly explains his involvement in the deciphering of mummy masks, images of which Scott Carroll has also made public (see my last pos...