No. But I'm not clear whether you're making a point about the second-century tomb, Peter.Peter Kirby wrote:A blog called Vatileaks isn't exactly trust-inspiring is it.
Search found 724 matches
- Wed Dec 25, 2013 5:30 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Tomb of St. Peter - authentic?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17366
Re: Tomb of St. Peter - authentic?
- Wed Dec 25, 2013 4:27 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Tomb of St. Peter - authentic?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 17366
Tomb of St. Peter - authentic?
Does anyone know of recent work, or views, on the question, whether the tomb accepted as St. Peter's by Pope Paul VI was in fact Peter's? (I'm not asking about the bone fragments recently brought out by the Vatican as relics of Peter.) I understand that the tomb in question, deep under the present V...
- Sat Nov 02, 2013 2:08 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: earliest MS of Justin Martyr found
- Replies: 11
- Views: 24336
Re: earliest MS of Justin Martyr found
I don't see how it's a strong suggestion to say that if the earliest manuscript of a given text is centuries later than the date of its purported composition, and if there existed a motive for someone to forge said text, then the text is likely to be a forgery. By those criteria, we'd athetize most ...
- Thu Oct 31, 2013 11:32 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: earliest MS of Justin Martyr found
- Replies: 11
- Views: 24336
earliest MS of Justin Martyr found
the POxy journal prints a fragment of a fourth century parchment MS of Justin Martyr's First Apology. The find becomes the earliest piece of text of that work. see link:
http://bricecjones.weebly.com/1/post/20 ... -5129.html
http://bricecjones.weebly.com/1/post/20 ... -5129.html