Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

Why do people say Mar(s)ion instead of Mar(k)ion?

My working hypothesis, which involves no actual work whatsoever, is canonical GMark(ion) is a reworking of The Evangelion.

BeDuhn doesn't cited which passage from Tertullius but he quotes him " If that gospel which among us is ascribed to Luke...is the same (gospel) that Markion accuses in his Antitheses", Be Duhn's point beingMarkion did not name Luke in his work and Tertullius is forced to hypothesize BeDuhn...

I don't know why SA and Stuart don't get along better, they pretty much say the same thing. Stuart was very helpful on the Adamantius and Marcion questions of Romans 8:1. Afaik, we get along fine :) . I think (and perseusomega9 can certainly correct me if I am wrong) that "SA" was suppose...

I don't know why SA and Stuart don't get along better, they pretty much say the same thing.

Ulan wrote: ↑Mon Oct 01, 2018 6:56 pm
You are just talking rubbish now. Which one is the "original Acts"?

The one that aligns with his theology of course.

also a great band name

Thanks, I've been wanting to read Trobisch's books on the Paulina and NT editing, and reinforced my need to read Gamble as well (BeDuhn is using him a lot in the current book as well). I don't do a lot of notes when I'm reading, nor keep an annotated bibliography, so all this is in my head. I'm a sc...

Entirely speculative but I love it. I can see why it's not embraced by scholars in general, given that he's assuming certain passages were present, absent, or in a different form based entirely on assumptions of what the original authors theology must have been, but he's also correct in the assumpti...