Ronald McDonald fails to see that Mt and Lk do not depend on Mk but on other lost common sources.
The xenophobic rule not to teach to non-Israel is just Judaizing appropriation of the gnostic rule of not sharing knowledge (bread of teh eucharist) with the uninitialized (not baptized).
Search found 644 matches
- Mon Oct 03, 2022 9:20 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Mark used Q
- Replies: 30
- Views: 1977
- Sun Oct 02, 2022 3:40 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Jean Pain: Jésus, dieu de la Pâque
- Replies: 17
- Views: 1290
Re: Jean Pain: Jésus, dieu de la Pâque
Guignebert died when that Jean pai was a little child, so it is hardly the same person.
- Sat Oct 01, 2022 1:21 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Constantine
- Replies: 26
- Views: 3063
Re: Constantine
Ashoka invented euhemeristically a historical Buddha in order to abuse buddhism for worldly purposes.
Mohammad is another fiction, as pointed out by Sven Kalisch.
Mohammad is another fiction, as pointed out by Sven Kalisch.
- Fri Sep 30, 2022 9:07 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Jean Pain: Jésus, dieu de la Pâque
- Replies: 17
- Views: 1290
Re: Jean Pain: Jésus, dieu de la Pâque
Also not to be confused with Painchaud (hot bread), the famous expert for gnostic myth and NT. Jungian synchronicity strikes again when I think about the etiology of the eucharistial bread...
- Thu Sep 29, 2022 11:35 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: "Jesus our Passover": was "Jesus" a mere liturgy before Paul?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 491
Re: "Jesus our Passover": was "Jesus" a mere liturgy before Paul?
Jesus as lamb already proves that the last supper as Paschal meal is a late forgery, alien to the extinct root of the synoptics. (whose existence is denied by right-wing extremist terrorists). For Jesus needs to be immolated on prep day, not the day after, in order to be the lamb. This has already b...
- Wed Sep 28, 2022 9:20 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Why don't mythicists condemn Satanism?
- Replies: 35
- Views: 2631
Re: Why don't mythicists condemn Satanism?
John T is hallucinating once again. There is no such thing as Satan in the Book of Genesis, and nowhere in the OT or DSS is it an origin of evil.
- Wed Sep 28, 2022 5:44 am
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Who are the current best proponents of Q?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1003
Re: Who are the current best proponents of Q?
Q makes perfect sense without abstruse faerie tales like an HJ. All it takes is logical conclusions from the obvious interpolations and deformations leaving redactorial fatigue in the canonical gospels. Those HJers with Q just have the compeletely wrong and absurd motivation for Q. Further, there is...
- Tue Sep 27, 2022 9:38 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Who are the current best proponents of Q?
- Replies: 14
- Views: 1003
Re: Who are the current best proponents of Q?
All those who abuse Q by connecting it with Markan Prioritism are automatically disqualified.
Carrier is a fool, as Q has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with historicity or not.
Carrier is a fool, as Q has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with historicity or not.
- Tue Sep 27, 2022 9:31 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Why don't mythicists condemn Satanism?
- Replies: 35
- Views: 2631
Re: Why don't mythicists condemn Satanism?
The historicasl Satan is John T, as already seen in the Book of Zachariah.
- Mon Sep 26, 2022 7:40 pm
- Forum: Christian Texts and History
- Topic: Matthean posteriority: Mark's "Levi son of Alphaeus"
- Replies: 39
- Views: 6151
Re: Matthean posteriority: Mark's "Levi son of Alphaeus"
Markan Prioritists only give idiotic ad-hoc explanations for the differences and similarities between the various mass feeding accounts of the synoptics. Lost sources give straightforward explanations. But mainline scholars fail to understand this.