Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

The historical movement is a figment of apologists and Judaizers like Goodacre; therefore, no group had any information whatsoever. Others know that extremes always come before the absurd compromises found in the NT.

Those references to the Torah are late interpolations.

The Judaic statements are foul and excessively late interpolations with no historical value whatsoever, ascribed to a fictional person invented by ancient deceivers and distractors no earlier than Trajan's time.

Priesthood has always been a secret society. They are also known as clergy, which derives from kleros, used in the Septuagint as an attribute for Israel as the chosen people entitled to inherit from their God. For many have been called but only a few are chosen. We see ones more the complete falsity...

The harmony between Mark and Paul, two excessively late piecemeals, only exists in the superstition of right-wing Markan Priorists like Goodacre and Dykstra, who lead many astray. Nothing maintained in the canon preserves anything original, only posterior manipulation and corruption in order to abus...

Of course they are falsely attributed to Paul, as the latter only exists in patristic and apologistic fantasy. But the synoptics are not better, as they are fragmented fiction by late and obfuscated authors spreading some faerie tales about fictitious people of early first century Galilee and Jerusa...

GA van den Bergh van Eysinga correctly realized the absolute falsity of Markan Prioritism and Pauline Authenticism, the major cancerous diseases of NT scholarship. Unfortunately, GA vdBvE failed to see that the eucharist is instituted in the feeeding miracles, not the cena, although he realized that...

Nolite thesaurizare vobis thesauros in terra.

The myth of the Hermetic baptise in the crater is the origin of the Christian baptism.

Denying the historicity of John B is straightforward, not far. That's because the figure of JB derives from the herald (keryx) of Corpus Hermeticus IV, as already figured by critical scholars like Jean Magne and denied obstinately by apologists like Hindley.