Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

This proves once more the absolute falsity of Markan prioritism over the other symnoptics, as already seen by Philippe Rolland, who used it albeit in an apologistic manner. Only Jean Magne recognized the feeding miracles appropriately in Logique des Sacrements, while mainline scholars all fail miser...

Markan priority is wholesale false, so the question of Matthean posteriority becomes irrelvant.

Most scholars are uncritical or apologists, such as Tabor. The triumphant Jerusalem foretold in Rev is the Jerusalem above and the Roman Catholic Church, not some man-made settlement in the wastelands of Palestina. The enemy is not imperial Rome but heresies such as Marcionism, successors of Babylon...

John of Patmos is a figment of apologists and uncritical scholars like LKJ.

Critical scholars like GA van den Bergh van Eysinga know that Mark and Rev are Hadrian's era earliest.

It would contain exclusively modern forgeries created by ChatGPT, Alexxa, and their brethren.

Sacrifices were practised in early Christianity, as follows from the Roman canon missae. James is wholesale fiction, as are all apostles and martyrs of old. Everything ever written about that Jesus guy is largelt past teh destruction of the temple , thus it serves post-factually the justification of...

That's because the whole epistle is late piecemeal forgery, as is everything in the New Testament.

No, it becomes nowhere near frustrating but simple and straightforward, as completely opposed to the naive faerie tale of a historical unique pre-70 Paul. The name Jesus, which means the salvific aspect of the Tetragrammaton, only entered the stage upon the (hypocritical) rejection of the original g...

The whole conversation with Ponty P is a late figment of apologists.

The Neronian stuff only existes in fantastic faerie tales like Quo Vadis.