So why did they give Tischendorf special treatment at the Vatican?
Sinaiticus authenticity discussion Wed 11/30/2022 - James Snapp Jr. and Steven Avery
-
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 9:27 am
Re: Sinaiticus authenticity discussion Wed 11/30/2022 - James Snapp Jr. and Steven Avery
-
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 9:27 am
Re: Sinaiticus - features that point to a late production
True, thanks.John T wrote: ↑Fri Mar 17, 2023 4:40 pm Time for a morality/ethics check. Just what would happen if the vial name calling from Maestroh was returned with a tit for tat?
Yeah, thought so!
It would be flagged and moved to Nowhere in Particular.
This sick double standard is quickly experienced by those who wonder onto this forum thinking it is a site for an honest discussion on Biblical Criticism and History.
Your silence is your tactic approval.
And the mythicists/atheists can't figure out why high esteemed scholars avoid Biblical Criticism & History Forum.
Sad, so sad.
However, at this point everyone who is astute knows of the Bill Brown sickness, vulgarity and more.
-
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 9:27 am
Re: Sinaiticus authenticity discussion Wed 11/30/2022 - James Snapp Jr. and Steven Avery
Interesting example.
An unusual, sophisticated ultra-Christianized OT nomina sacra would be unusual for an ancient manuscript, it would be quite sensible for an Orthodox scholar in the 1800s.
It is interesting that it was placed in the New Finds dump room.
Re: Sinaiticus authenticity discussion Wed 11/30/2022 - James Snapp Jr. and Steven Avery
Well, you can eat your heart out then, with the next dozen examples:Steven Avery wrote: ↑Wed Mar 22, 2023 4:51 pmInteresting example.
An unusual, sophisticated ultra-Christianized OT nomina sacra would be unusual for an ancient manuscript, it would be quite sensible for an Orthodox scholar in the 1800s.
It is interesting that it was placed in the New Finds dump room.
viewtopic.php?p=151700#p151700
I like that "ultra-Christianized OT nomina sacra", can I coin it
Re: Sinaiticus - features that point to a late production
Pointing out a guy is lying and demonstrating it ain't name-calling.
Also - he wouldn't dare.
He's been challenged for years to back up his bold talk - and like every other bullying narcissist (insert the former Queens landlord as an example) - he's got "Keyboard Courage" but not much else.
No, you see, I'm not the petulant little scaredy cat child here.
He comes in swinging a big stick, gets hit back, and then cries to moderators because that's who he is.
I called him a liar and fraud and a fake and a conspiracy theorist and THEN I DEMONSTRATED MY CHARGES TO BE TRUE!!!
Pointing out a guy is lying and demonstrating that's exactly what he's doing is not attacking or insulting anyone.
It's paying homage to truth.
If he wants to quit lying and publicly admit that's what he's done, I'll drop it.
So should I assume you're just so dumb you don't know the difference between TACTIC and TACIT?
So let's apply that one: since you're not calling Steven Avery for his demonstrable lies, you APPROVE of them, right?
See how that works?
Wow, incredible.
I get implicitly called a mythicist/atheist for TELLING THE TRUTH about someone.
I don't think you've thought this one through, buddy boy.
Yeah, let's quote the Ex-Blimp who needs to be executed for his insurrection, that'll cover it.
Re: Sinaiticus - features that point to a late production
You've lived your entire life as a coward and will clearly die one, too.Steven Avery wrote: ↑Wed Mar 22, 2023 4:48 pm True, thanks.
However, at this point everyone who is astute knows of the Bill Brown sickness, vulgarity and more.
It's not my fault you LIED, Steven.
And then you again gaslight me by accusing me of YOUR sickness.
You're an ignorant old man, Steven, who wasted his life.
That's all you are, it's all you'll ever be.
There's no more "fake tough" in the USA than "Queens talking tough", which is apparently an epidemic in your neighborhood.
Re: Sinaiticus authenticity discussion Wed 11/30/2022 - James Snapp Jr. and Steven Avery
Steven Avery wrote: ↑Wed Mar 22, 2023 4:51 pmInteresting example.
An unusual, sophisticated ultra-Christianized OT nomina sacra would be unusual for an ancient manuscript, it would be quite sensible for an Orthodox scholar in the 1800s.
It is interesting that it was placed in the New Finds dump room.
Folks, he doesn't know ANY of this.
He just makes stuff up as he types.
He can't even read Sinaiticus, but he thinks he should be taken seriously because he's able to manufacture a conspiracy theory.
-
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 9:27 am
Sinaiticus - "ultra-Christianized OT nomina sacra"
I like these a lot, we will be examining them and decide whether they will be part of the presentations. Sinaiticus is filled with anachronistic linguistic elements, (a new one I just saw the other day has to do with the decay of Greek prepositions) that really should be much later than 4th century. Our Greek-skilled gentleman was noticing many curiousities in the Sinaiticus nomina sacra and you may have the single most interesting presentation on the net for such curiousities.mlinssen wrote: ↑Thu Mar 23, 2023 12:40 am Well, you can eat your heart out then, with the next dozen examples:
viewtopic.php?p=151700#p151700
I like that "ultra-Christianized OT nomina sacra", can I coin it
At the moment however, we are studying Tobit and the Mt. Athos manuscript there that is textually connected to Sinaiticus from chapter 3 to 6, overlapping the lacuna in Sinaiticus in chapter 4. The Greek minuscule script there is a bit of a bear.
We do need to compare that Joshua papyrus you highlight, some of those Bodmer papyri have very sketchy provenance. The James David Audlin article on P66 is interesting and is on Academia.edu.
There is no © or TM to the phrase, "ultra-Christianized OT nomina sacra", you can utilize it freely, but it is already minted and coined. However, in the spirit of the Sinaiticus replica or forgery, you can claim originality, like Tischendorf pushing Sinaiticus.