mlinssen wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 6:33 am There are so many bullshit stories invented by people who fail to prove their theory right, and then they invent "a third independent source" when the direction of dependence doesn't suit them.
That’s exactly what i think about the priority of the gospel of Marcion and/or Thomas
Well, looking at gospels and letters, those could actually from the very first case of an independent source: there is NOTHING connecting either of these two, Mark and Paul: zilch, nada, rien, nichts - NEVER. Intentional? How can it not be intentional, when two kids from the same class who sit in the same classroom produce a similar story that overlap at core points, yet don't show verbatim agreement? IF they are, that is...
mlinssen wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 6:33 am There are so many bullshit stories invented by people who fail to prove their theory right, and then they invent "a third independent source" when the direction of dependence doesn't suit them.
That’s exactly what i think about the priority of the gospel of Marcion and/or Thomas
Well, looking at gospels and letters, those could actually from the very first case of an independent source: there is NOTHING connecting either of these two, Mark and Paul: zilch, nada, rien, nichts - NEVER. Intentional? How can it not be intentional, when two kids from the same class who sit in the same classroom produce a similar story that overlap at core points, yet don't show verbatim agreement? IF they are, that is...
Are you sure ?
Yes, and because you fail to actually demonstrate any of it, you stick to "thinking".
Go on, show me verbatim agreement between Mark and Paul. Two words in a row would be really thrilling
mlinssen wrote: ↑Fri Feb 17, 2023 6:53 am
Yes, and because you fail to actually demonstrate any of it, you stick to "thinking".
Go on, show me verbatim agreement between Mark and Paul. Two words in a row would be really thrilling
Ooh... You obviously haven't read any books on the subject, have you? I invite you to do so.
328497846_925747538842724_514898544623636231_n.jpg (121.69 KiB) Viewed 504 times
But obviously you won't because you are dogmatic and only interested in what will reinforce your little Thomas/Marcion theory.
I have several tables available, I'll post some examples later. Even if my motivation to interact with someone who spends his life here trying to boost his ego is close to zero.
This term κοινὸς in this particular context of dietary law does not appear in any non-Jewish (Greek-Roman) Gentile text of the time contemporary with Mark and Paul .
And our two authors are obviously addressing Gentiles.
Capture d’écran 2023-02-18 à 14.16.22.png (45.19 KiB) Viewed 428 times
The expression "slave of all" appears only once in the whole Bible : in this epistle of Paul and in the Gospel of Mark.
--------------------------------
Capture d’écran 2023-02-18 à 14.26.09.png (313.16 KiB) Viewed 428 times
--------------------------------
There are many other examples.
Many of the teachings of Jesus in Mark come from Paul. Therefore, the idea that Mark is a pro-Pauline gospel is neither a silly idea nor an idea rejected by scholars. In fact, it is mostly conservatives who reject this idea.
