The strongest chronological clue proving that Jesus == Judas the Galilean

[Giuseppe]

• Why is Jesus sent from Annas to Caiaphas?
  
  
  Then Annas sent him bound to Caiaphas the high priest.
  
  (John 18:24)

• Why is Annas still the high priest when the disciples were persecuted?
  
  
  The next day the rulers, the elders and the teachers of the law met in Jerusalem. 6 Annas the high priest was there, and so were Caiaphas, John, Alexander and others of the high priest’s family. 7 They had Peter and John brought before them and began to question them: “By what power or what name did you do this?”
  
  (Acts 4:6-7)

The connection Jesus/Annas is the trace of a previous chronological datation of Jesus under Annas (and Quirinius):



Having been the Precursor placed under Caiaphas (and Pilate), then accordingly Jesus had to be placed after him.

Thoughts?

[StephenGoranson]

My thought: that's no proof.

[Giuseppe]

I have talked of "strongest clue", not of "proof".

More attention, please.

[StephenGoranson]

I took the word "proof" from your title:
"The strongest chronological clue proving that Jesus == Judas the Galilean"

[Giuseppe]

insofar a "clue" proves something, it is not a proof.

[StephenGoranson]

Neither a proof nor a strong clue?

[Giuseppe]

A strong chronological clue in the direction of Judas the Galilean being at the origin of the datation of Jesus under Annas high priest.

Are you satisfied now?

[StephenGoranson]

Well, no. I am not aware of any plausible indication that "Jesus == Judas the Galilean."

[Giuseppe]

So are you saying that a Jesus crucified when Annas was high priest (and Quirinius governor of Syria) doesn't raise no suspicion at all that he was one and the same Judas the Galilean?

[StephenGoranson]

Giuseppe, though you are free to interpret matters differently, please try to hear my view: I find no reason to think that "Jesus == Judas the Galilean." Not any. None whatsoever. No.