No, so you're wrong again.
The Temptation Story in Mark is anti-marcionite
- Peter Kirby
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8649
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 2:13 pm
- Location: Santa Clara
- Contact:
- Peter Kirby
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8649
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 2:13 pm
- Location: Santa Clara
- Contact:
Re: The Temptation Story in Mark is anti-marcionite
It's not even properly an argument, as it doesn't lead from true premises in a sound way to a conclusion.
It's just a claim.
I can write "no" more if you need me to be more clear.
- Peter Kirby
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8649
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 2:13 pm
- Location: Santa Clara
- Contact:
- Peter Kirby
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8649
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 2:13 pm
- Location: Santa Clara
- Contact:
Re: The Temptation Story in Mark is anti-marcionite
The quote doesn't even use the word YHWH, so even if Klinghardt were the inspired writer of Truth you irrationally take him for...Giuseppe wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:59 am Klinghardt gives me reason on this point:
The Markan report of Jesus’ baptism not only places the beginning of the Gospel into a framework of salvation history, it also provides the opportunity to have God himself proclaim the true identity of Jesus as ‘my beloved son’ (Mark 1,11). Compared to Jesus’ identification by the demons at the beginning of *Ev, this is a skilled and advanced development. It prepares the summary of Jesus’ message after he proved his sonship by resisting Satan’s temptations in the desert (Mark 1,12f).
(The Oldest Gospel, p. 233, my bold)
The "true identity" of Jesus as son of YHWH. Since only YHWH is the god behind the baptism by John (and behind the spirit sent during this baptism).
But then I'm just getting sucked into your nonsense. Klinghardt can write as much invalid stuff as you can, at the end of the day.
- Peter Kirby
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8649
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 2:13 pm
- Location: Santa Clara
- Contact:
- Peter Kirby
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8649
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 2:13 pm
- Location: Santa Clara
- Contact:
Re: The Temptation Story in Mark is anti-marcionite
Conversation goes completely stale because you have nothing valid to say.
You keep saying invalid things, which are essentially the same things already said.
Then it's a "gotcha" if someone doesn't keep saying no.
Fun times in Ward 6, I guess.
You keep saying invalid things, which are essentially the same things already said.
Then it's a "gotcha" if someone doesn't keep saying no.
Fun times in Ward 6, I guess.
-
- Posts: 506
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2023 10:31 am
Re: The Temptation Story in Mark is anti-marcionite
*chuckle* Nice visual. Nobody can accuse you of using dead metaphors.
-
- Posts: 506
- Joined: Wed Sep 27, 2023 10:31 am
Re: The Temptation Story in Mark is anti-marcionite
Klinghardt is comparing and contrasting with Marcion's evangelion, right? If so, this is a scene of the sons of YHWH (the demons) denouncing in the strongest possible way that Jesus has anything to do with YHWH, no?Giuseppe wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:59 am Klinghardt gives me reason on this point:
The Markan report of Jesus’ baptism not only places the beginning of the Gospel into a framework of salvation history, it also provides the opportunity to have God himself proclaim the true identity of Jesus as ‘my beloved son’ (Mark 1,11). Compared to Jesus’ identification by the demons at the beginning of *Ev, this is a skilled and advanced development.
Re: The Temptation Story in Mark is anti-marcionite
in your satirical polemic (no problem, for that matter), you are ignoring the point of Klinghardt that is even more subtle than the my point:Peter Kirby wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2024 10:52 amThe quote doesn't even use the word YHWH, so even if Klinghardt were the inspired writer of Truth you irrationally take him for...Giuseppe wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 9:59 am Klinghardt gives me reason on this point:
The Markan report of Jesus’ baptism not only places the beginning of the Gospel into a framework of salvation history, it also provides the opportunity to have God himself proclaim the true identity of Jesus as ‘my beloved son’ (Mark 1,11). Compared to Jesus’ identification by the demons at the beginning of *Ev, this is a skilled and advanced development. It prepares the summary of Jesus’ message after he proved his sonship by resisting Satan’s temptations in the desert (Mark 1,12f).
(The Oldest Gospel, p. 233, my bold)
The "true identity" of Jesus as son of YHWH. Since only YHWH is the god behind the baptism by John (and behind the spirit sent during this baptism).
But then I'm just getting sucked into your nonsense. Klinghardt can write as much invalid stuff as you can, at the end of the day.
Differently from me, K doesn't require that "YHWH" has to be mentioned (or is going to be mentioned). K is pointing out how Mark 1:11 is concerned with the identity of Jesus being made clear by "God". This is a breaking of the secrecy, since a more consistent secrecy would require that the identity of Jesus should be left in the shadow. We find that more consistent secrecy in *Ev, where none would believe the demons on the word, even when they are the only actors who hail Jesus as "son of God".
As a side note, remember that the author of this picture was excommunicated:
Why? Because the excessive secrecy about Jesus has always disturbed the catholic of any age, and Mark was too.
As a second side note: Think about how much comical is the scene: Basilides read *Ev and says: "I prefer canonical Luke to *Ev, because that secrecy in *Ev disturbs even myself, despite of the fact that both I and Marcion hate YHWH".
- Peter Kirby
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8649
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 2:13 pm
- Location: Santa Clara
- Contact:
Re: The Temptation Story in Mark is anti-marcionite
Can I be excused from writing more "polemic"?
I'm going to see a movie.
I'm going to see a movie.