Is Price historicist or is Carrier orthodox?

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
Post Reply
User avatar
Giuseppe
Posts: 13872
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:37 am
Location: Italy

Is Price historicist or is Carrier orthodox?

Post by Giuseppe »

I point out this interesting claim by prof Price:
I am not trying to say that there was a single origin of the Christian savior Jesus Christ, and that origin is pure myth; rather, I am saying that there may indeed have been such a myth, and that if so, it eventually flowed together with other Jesus images, some one of which may actually have been based on a historical Jesus the Nazorean. The old Christ-Myth theorists took for granted a single-root origin theory, just as orthodoxy did; it just chose a different candidate for the root.
(Robert Price, Deconstructing Jesus, p.162-163, my bold)

According to Price, then Richard Carrier would be an old Christ-Myth theorist, because he thinks that the first Jew to hallucinate the archangel Jesus was Peter and only him.

But according to Carrier's definition of minimal historicity, Price would be a minimalist historicist or possibly a Jesus agnostic.
Nihil enim in speciem fallacius est quam prava religio. -Liv. xxxix. 16.
Post Reply