Re: Demonstrating Q (Quelle) was a document and "Luke" did not know gMatthew.
Posted: Thu Apr 29, 2021 8:29 am
to mlinssen,
So the Q document would incorporate a mix of (few) deemed authentic sayings with many created ones.
The created stuff would have nothing to do with Peter, certainly true about Q sayings showing knowledge of GMark.
Cordially, Bernard
This is what I wrote:So, so you have different Q's for different parts of the NT?
How many Q trajectories do you have then - and do you have pictures to go with all of them? I found it rather helpful
I think some Q sayings were collected very early. That process kept going for decades (with many sayings/narratives being created) up to even after gMark was known. Then, before gLuke & gMatthew were written, these sayings (with a few narratives), some in Aramaic, the other in Greek were put in a single document "Quelle". Aramaic parts were then translated in Greek, sometimes differently.
So the Q document would incorporate a mix of (few) deemed authentic sayings with many created ones.
The created stuff would have nothing to do with Peter, certainly true about Q sayings showing knowledge of GMark.
Cordially, Bernard