Potamius of Lisbon references the heavenly witnesses in writing to Athanasius
-
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 9:27 am
Re: Potamius of Lisbon references the heavenly witnesses in writing to Athanasius
Too much flying conjectures and railing accusations.
You could far more easily complain about the missing supposed invisible allegory of spirit, water and blood!
You could far more easily complain about the missing supposed invisible allegory of spirit, water and blood!
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2021 8:37 am
Re: Potamius of Lisbon references the heavenly witnesses in writing to Athanasius
Is that what you think the literal non-allegorical meaning of Potamius' "three tents" reference is?
Last edited by Investigator on Fri Jan 14, 2022 11:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2021 8:37 am
Re: Potamius of Lisbon references the heavenly witnesses in writing to Athanasius
To much avoidance of the obvious (by you) and an obvious incapability of replying to the substance of the argumentation.Steven Avery wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:19 am Too much flying conjectures and railing accusations.
You could far more easily complain about the missing supposed invisible allegory of spirit, water and blood!
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2021 8:37 am
Re: Potamius of Lisbon references the heavenly witnesses in writing to Athanasius
Steven Avery wrote: ↑Fri Jan 14, 2022 10:19 am Too much flying conjectures and railing accusations.
You could far more easily complain about the missing supposed invisible allegory of spirit, water and blood!
Where's Potamius explanation of the "three tents" allegory, if it really is an explained allegory (let alone a literal explanation) Steven?
-
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 9:27 am
Re: Potamius of Lisbon references the heavenly witnesses in writing to Athanasius
It is the spirit, water and blood that you claim as an allegory that is invisible.
The three of the tabernacles relate to the three of the Trinity.
The three of the tabernacles relate to the three of the Trinity.
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2021 8:37 am
Re: Potamius of Lisbon references the heavenly witnesses in writing to Athanasius
Where does Potamius unpack the meaning of "the Trinity" allegory of the "three tents", tent by tent, person by person as applying to the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit? Which tent does Potamius say belongs to the Father?Steven Avery wrote: ↑Sat Jan 15, 2022 7:11 am It is the spirit, water and blood that you claim as an allegory that is invisible.
The three of the tabernacles relate to the three of the Trinity.
-
- Posts: 988
- Joined: Sun Oct 19, 2014 9:27 am
Re: Potamius of Lisbon references the heavenly witnesses in writing to Athanasius
The focus is simply on the three analogy.
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2021 8:37 am
Re: Potamius of Lisbon references the heavenly witnesses in writing to Athanasius
Then if what you say is true Steven, where does Potamius explain the meaning of the Trinity "analogy" of the "three tents", tent by tent, person by person as applying unambiguously the analogy to the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit? Again, which tent does Potamius say belongs to the Father (for example)?
Note: Emphasis is on "explain", as in your explained (visible) allegory >>> vs <<< un-explained (in-visible) allegory.
Last edited by Investigator on Tue Jan 18, 2022 1:22 pm, edited 3 times in total.
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2021 8:37 am
Re: Potamius of Lisbon references the heavenly witnesses in writing to Athanasius
Are you saying Potamius is using an in-visible (un-explained) "analogy" Steven?
-
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2021 8:37 am
Re: Potamius of Lisbon references the heavenly witnesses in writing to Athanasius
Perhaps Potamius (via Conti) explains the "three tents" analogy in the next sentence Steven. Does he?
Also, what metaphorical similarity does a "tent" have to the Trinity to belong to the category of an "analogy"?
Also, what metaphorical similarity does a "tent" have to the Trinity to belong to the category of an "analogy"?