Steven Avery wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 2:33 pmThis shows that you are a dishonest textual broker.Investigator wrote: ↑Tue Jan 11, 2022 8:45 am Psuedo-Scholars (sic) who accept your corrupt critical TR text begin with pseudo-CT-quackery presuppositions, limiting the value of your verse referencing.
Plus your tepid attempt at turnabout argumentation shows that you can not really deal with the fundamental issues.
=================
As to the verse numbers, I quoted my source, and then passed on to them that it would be better to not change the Conti numbering without explanation. So I was scrupulously honest, and you are a false accuser. No surprise there.
You go that route because the invisible allegory argument is absurd.
A total waste of time, a scholastic embarrassment.
You would not have changed the numbering of your own accord 1. if you weren't called out on the misrepresentation publicly, and 2. because you have just tacitly admitted you didn't research Conti's book yourself (admitting what we knew all along that you really are a pseudo-TC-quackery fraudster) but relied on, what YOU ALSO tacitly/actually admit is, faulty and dishonest secondary research, and 3. you ARE COMPLICIT because you were personally involved in the publishing and researching of "The Witness of God is Greater" book (your name is in the credits). Meaning you cannot plead ignorance nor innocence!