Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
-
Giuseppe
- Posts: 13883
- Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2015 5:37 am
- Location: Italy
Post
by Giuseppe »
Evidently no.
But there other two facts about the epistle of Judah:
- His author thinks that Jesus is stricto sensu Joshua: only read verse 5, where "Joshua" replaced "Kyrios" in a older version.
- The authors knew probably anti-demiurgists. Only read verse 4.
Hence, an early date has serious effects: there were anti-demiurgists even before the first gospel.
Also a late date has serious implications: there was a total ignorance of the gospels even after the first gospel.