Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

IhIESUM as IN

https://digital.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/objec ... 0dcc114c0/

Ok. The first 100 pages is good enough for today.

Plus, I'm starting to think that I'm just talking to myself anyway.

IhESUS as IHCOYC

https://digital.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/objec ... 2df4f6de2/

^ one interesting thing that I note is how the author is writing IHCOYC (Iesous) in Latin as IhESUS were it looks like he is rendering the Greek H (eta) as hE as if it was pronounced like "heta". Normally the author is using just capital letters when writing the Latin except when he transliterates the Greek letter eta which he prefixes with a lowercase H (h).

And now we have Deus as OThOYC

https://digital.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/objec ... dabe04ebb/#

Here we have an example of hIESUS ChRISTUS out of IHCOYC OXPICTOC

https://digital.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/objec ... 5aaa9fecf/#

hIESU ChRISTI from IY XY

https://digital.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/objec ... bc2583691/#

I can see from the views that people are at least checking this thread out. Don't be shy, jump on in any time.

fwiw

Secret Alias wrote: ↑Tue Jan 04, 2022 4:18 pm ... Origen explicitly says in his letter to Africanus איש 1 is rendered in Greek as ΙΣ. It's pronounced 'ish' by Jews. But a Targumic rendering of אישו is Ishu/Isu ...

1 man, see https://biblehub.com/hebrew/376.htm

If you have JSTOR access this may be of interest
nomina sacra in E

Andrew Criddle