I do wonder how broadly a (welcome) chronological ‘drift’ is presently encountered in the halls of scholarship and invite readers to send along information on any scholars who promote a second century dating for one or more of the canonical gospels (and/or for the Pauline epistles).
Added my 2 cents. But it's interesting to see the increase of orthodoxy. The usual suspects were wildly enthusiastic about this little booklet - biblical academic will never change, and continue ruminating the buzz in their echo chamber
I just learned from a starting academic that she was on 15k salary for the first 10 years - rats on a starvation diet will fight for their own lives and everyone else's