schillingklaus wrote: ↑Sat Aug 13, 2022 8:09 am
The gospels are just indirectly euhemerizing corruption of pre-Christian gnostic tradition. Therefore, H. Raschke already realized that the evangelical Christ is a historization of the Paulinic christ, who is a Catholically tuned gnostic Christ, who is entirely metaphysical. Euhemerists are unable to discern the metaphysical foundations beneath layers of mutilation.
Granted on all points
They're also unable to discern that someone who says
Matthew 13:11 Ὁ (-) δὲ (And) ἀποκριθεὶς (answering), εἶπεν (He said) ‹αὐτοῖς› (to them), “Ὅτι (Because) Ὑμῖν (to you) δέδοται (it has been granted) γνῶναι (to know) τὰ (the) μυστήρια (mysteries) τῆς (of the) βασιλείας (kingdom) τῶν (of the) οὐρανῶν (heavens)
Mark 4:11 Καὶ (And) ἔλεγεν (He was saying) αὐτοῖς (to them), “Ὑμῖν (To you) τὸ (the) μυστήριον (mystery) δέδοται (has been given) τῆς (of the) βασιλείας (kingdom) τοῦ (-) Θεοῦ (of God). ἐκείνοις (To those) δὲ (however) τοῖς (who are) ἔξω (outside), ἐν (in) παραβολαῖς (parables) τὰ (-) πάντα (everything) γίνεται (is done)
Luke 8:10 Ὁ (-) δὲ (And) εἶπεν (He said), “Ὑμῖν (To you) δέδοται (it has been given) γνῶναι (to know) τὰ (the) μυστήρια (mysteries) τῆς (of the) βασιλείας (kingdom) τοῦ (-) Θεοῦ (of God); τοῖς (to) δὲ (however) λοιποῖς (the rest), ἐν (it is in) παραβολαῖς (parables), ἵνα (so that)
is a provider of those mysteries, and hence a mysterious man himself
And the fact that these are the only verses in the gospels, the complete and utter absence or use or even reference to any and all of it elsewhere, is suspicious, no?
62. said IS : I say [dop] my(PL) Mystery to they-who are-worthy of my(PL) Mystery
he-who your(F.SG) right-hand will make-be he there-is-not to-cause your(F.SG) left-hand understand : [dop] she/r make-be who/at?
Ambiguity in that very last word still to solve, it could also mean "them"