andrewcriddle wrote: ↑Thu May 11, 2023 8:16 amIt seems to be more about plagiarism (and self plagiarism) than fraud in the sense of bogus results.
Andrew Criddle
1/3rd of neuroscience
papers.
After screening some 5000 papers, he estimates up to 34% of neuroscience papers published in 2020 were likely made up or plagiarized; in medicine, the figure was 24%.
Of 15,120 PubMed®-listed publications, most fakes were
native Chinese:
Results The classification rules using two (three) indicators had sensitivities of 86% (90%) and false alarm rates of 44% (37%). From 2010 to 2020 the RFP rate increased from 16% to 28%. Given the 1.3 million biomedical Scimago-listed publications in 2020, we estimate the scope of >300,000 RFPs annually. Countries with the highest RFP proportion are Russia, Turkey, China, Egypt, and India (39%-48%), with China, in absolute terms, as the largest contributor of all RFPs (55%).
Not to sound all rayczist, but
eliminate heavily restrict those academic '
BRICs' and the ratio of 'Cheating, Low-Life Scum' in biomed fields drops accordingly. This is a political-economic problem for the West.