split from: Why the Hellenistic era for ALL "Old Testament" books should be taken seriously

Discussion about the Hebrew Bible, Septuagint, pseudepigrapha, Philo, Josephus, Talmud, Dead Sea Scrolls, archaeology, etc.
User avatar
Peter Kirby
Site Admin
Posts: 8676
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 2:13 pm
Location: Santa Clara
Contact:

Re: split from: Why the Hellenistic era for ALL "Old Testament" books should be taken seriously

Post by Peter Kirby »

neilgodfrey wrote: Mon Mar 11, 2024 11:07 pm I see there a about a dozen messages in my inbox which I presume are from the moderator.
You were also aware of these notifications (of my posts) and chose to ignore them.
User avatar
Peter Kirby
Site Admin
Posts: 8676
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 2:13 pm
Location: Santa Clara
Contact:

Re: split from: Why the Hellenistic era for ALL "Old Testament" books should be taken seriously

Post by Peter Kirby »

neilgodfrey wrote: Fri Feb 23, 2024 10:32 pm
andrewcriddle wrote: Fri Feb 23, 2024 3:54 am I am unable to regard this as prima-facie plausible.
I was reminded of the opening paragraph in the introduction to a 1904 study making a case for the Hellenistic origin of ideas and conflicts found in the OT:
I am well aware that many will not even get past the title of this book [= Greek Philosophy in the Old Testament], which is likely to provoke their strongest objection. Therefore, I would like to ask the reader to suppress all doubt as long as the train of thought and the chain of evidence, as they unfold from beginning to end, are not clear to them. Generally, this is easier said than done. Because the preconceived judgment that we bring to the reading of the holy scriptures and the ancient interpretations dealing with them greatly complicates objective consideration. The sacred awe for the divine spirit that speaks from the Old and New Testament writings, which we do not like to think of as the result of a natural, long cultural development, forbids us to consider foreign, and moreover profane, influences. — I myself had to overcome this perennial awe. I know too well how much I recoiled at the thought that the hagiographers were largely created in the Greek era and under the influence of the Greek spirit when it first occurred to me, and how anxiously I tried to dismiss it! But that was futile effort. It kept coming back, more insistently each time. Only after years of continuous reflection and research, and when I saw how many riddles it promised to solve for me, was I able to rise to greater inner freedom, to let go of the illusion of the venerable age of these biblical works created by traditional transmissions, which indeed opened up the rewarding perspective on the astonishing receptivity and adaptability of Judaism, which actually seemed to predestine it as a "guide for mortals." Thus, the gain was greater than the loss. (translation)
Friedländer, Moriz. Griechische Philosophie im alten Testament. Berlin: Reimer, 1904. http://archive.org/details/griechischephilo00frie.
This was not ok for Academic Discussion. It was moved to Jewish Texts and History here.

viewtopic.php?f=6&t=11556
Locked