The fate of the Pharisees

Discussion about the Hebrew Bible, Septuagint, pseudepigrapha, Philo, Josephus, Talmud, Dead Sea Scrolls, archaeology, etc.
User avatar
MrMacSon
Posts: 8859
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:45 pm

The fate of the Pharisees

Post by MrMacSon »


Of all the major Second Temple sects, only the Pharisees remained. Their vision of Jewish law as a means by which ordinary people could engage with the sacred in their daily lives was a position meaningful to the majority of Jews. Such teachings extended beyond ritual practices. According to the classic midrash in Avot D'Rabbi Nathan (4:5):

The Temple is destroyed. We never witnessed its glory. But Rabbi Joshua did. And when he looked at the Temple ruins one day, he burst into tears. "Alas for us! The place which atoned for the sins of all the people Israel lies in ruins!" Then Rabbi Yohannan ben Zakkai spoke to him these words of comfort: "Be not grieved, my son. There is another way of gaining ritual atonement, even though the Temple is destroyed. We must now gain ritual atonement through deeds of loving-kindness."

Following the destruction of the Temple, Rome governed Judea through a Procurator at Caesarea and a Jewish Patriarch and levied the Fiscus Judaicus. Yohanan ben Zakkai, a leading Pharisee, was appointed the first Patriarch (the Hebrew word, Nasi, also means prince, or president), and he re-established the Sanhedrin at Yavneh (see the related Council of Jamnia) under Pharisee control. Instead of giving tithes to the priests and sacrificing offerings at the (now-destroyed) Temple, the rabbis instructed Jews to give charity. Moreover, they argued that all Jews should study in local synagogues, because Torah is "the inheritance of the congregation of Jacob" (Deut. 33: 4).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharisees ... _to_rabbis


After the destruction of the Second Temple, these sectarian divisions ended. The Rabbis avoided the term "Pharisee," perhaps because it was a term more often used by non-Pharisees, but also because the term was explicitly sectarian. The Rabbis claimed leadership over all Jews, and added to the Amidah the birkat haMinim, a prayer which in part exclaims, "Praised are You O Lord, who breaks enemies and defeats the wicked," and which is understood as a rejection of sectarians and sectarianism. This shift by no means resolved conflicts over the interpretation of the Torah; rather, it relocated debates between sects to debates within Rabbinic Judaism. The Pharisaic commitment to scholarly debate as a value in and of itself, rather than merely a byproduct of sectarianism, emerged as a defining feature of Rabbinic Judaism.

Thus, as the Pharisees argued that all Israel should act as priests, the Rabbis argued that all Israel should act as rabbis: "The rabbis furthermore want to transform the entire Jewish community into an academy where the whole Torah is studied and kept .... redemption depends on the "rabbinization" of all Israel, that is, upon the attainment of all Jewry of a full and complete embodiment of revelation or Torah, thus achieving a perfect replica of heaven." [Neusner, Jacob Invitation to the Talmud: a Teaching Book (1998): 9]

The Rabbinic era itself is divided into two periods. The first period was that of the Tannaim (from the Aramaic word for "repeat;" the Aramaic root TNY is equivalent to the Hebrew root SNY, which is the basis for "Mishnah." Thus, Tannaim are "Mishnah teachers"), the sages who repeated and thus passed down the Oral Torah. During this period rabbis finalized the canonization of the Tanakh, and in 200 Judah haNasi edited together Tannaitic judgements and traditions into the Mishnah, considered by the rabbis to be the definitive expression of the Oral Torah (although some of the sages mentioned in the Mishnah are Pharisees who lived prior to the destruction of the Second Temple, or prior to the Bar Kozeba Revolt, most of the sages mentioned lived after the revolt).

The second period is that of the Amoraim (from the Aramaic word for "speaker") rabbis and their students who continued to debate legal matters and discuss the meaning of the books of the Bible. In Palestine, these discussions occurred at important academies at Tiberias, Caesarea, and Sepphoris. In Babylonia, these discussions largely occurred at important academies that had been established at Nehardea, Pumpeditha and Sura. This tradition of study and debate reached its fullest expression in the development of the Talmudim, elaborations of the Mishnah and records of Rabbinic debates, stories, and judgements, compiled around 400 in Palestine and around 500 in Babylon.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pharisees ... velopments


About 100 BCE a long struggle ensued as the Pharisees tried to democratize the Jewish religion and remove it from the control of the Temple priests. The Pharisees asserted that God could and should be worshipped even away from the Temple and outside Jerusalem. To the Pharisees, worship consisted not in bloody sacrifices—the practice of the Temple priests—but in prayer and in the study of God’s law. Hence, the Pharisees fostered the synagogue as an institution of religious worship, outside and separate from the Temple. The synagogue may thus be considered a Pharasaic institution, since the Pharisees developed it, raised it to high eminence, and gave it a central place in Jewish religious life.

The active period of Pharasaism, the most-influential movement in the development of Orthodox Judaism, extended well into the 2nd and 3rd centuries CE. The Pharisees preserved and transmitted Judaism through the flexibility they gave to Jewish scriptural interpretation in the face of changing historical circumstances. The efforts they devoted to education also had a seminal importance in subsequent Jewish history. After the destruction of the Second Temple and the fall of Jerusalem in 70 CE, the synagogue and the schools of the Pharisees continued to function and to promote Judaism in the long centuries following the Diaspora.

Perhaps in, In Quest of the Historical Pharisees, edited by Jacob Neusner & Bruce D. Chilton, 2007
StephenGoranson
Posts: 2495
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 2:10 am

Re: The fate of the Pharisees

Post by StephenGoranson »

Albert Baumgarten, “The Name of the Pharisees,” J. of Biblical Literature 1983, proposed two meanings of the name: pĕrûšîm,“separatists,” and pārôšîm,“specifiers.”
After the destruction of the Temple, there were efforts to reduce separatism, so the name Pharisee in the sense of separatist was disliked, at least by some. Some rabbis—example in Sota 22b—condemn some separatists. Compare minin and kitot taking on negative connotations.
Germanicus_C
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2022 10:51 am

Re: The fate of the Pharisees

Post by Germanicus_C »

Is this assumption crazy?

John the Baptist from the Gospels is actually Yohanan Ben Zakkai (Zakkai abbreviation of Zecharya).
Yohanan Ben Zecharya has been given safe-conduct with another Jewish non-anti-Roman opposed factions (eg Notzri-Nazarene?)
from the Romans (and Josephus and the remaining "High" Priests probably) to open a Rabbinic-Pharisee School in Jamnia/Yavne to target.

The Gospel writers have used the figures of John (aka the Baptist) (+36CE) and Thaddeus(+46CE) and Yohanan Ben Zakkai in Josephus' books for their accounts of John the Baptist.

Jamnia/Yavne is close to Mount Carmel(...),
a place where Vespanius, Mucianus and Basilides (High Priest of the Serapis cult and representative of Tiberius Alexander) had a council on July 1, 69 CE.
Vespasian a follower of the Isis-Serapis-Chrest cult (ΙΣ Chrest)?

Mount Carmel is said to have been a refuge for the Essene(?)-Notzri-Nazarene faction and is close to Yavne.

Nazareth, also not far from MC, could refer to Notzri-Nazareen (the Branch). Village founded by Nazarenes after 70 CE?

The separation of the faiths would then be symbolically described in the Gospels?

The whole story consists of synchretism?
Secret Alias
Posts: 18750
Joined: Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:47 am

Re: The fate of the Pharisees

Post by Secret Alias »

(Zakkai abbreviation of Zecharya)

No etymological link.
Zakkai comes from a root which means to clean or purify.
Zachar = to remember
Jair
Posts: 75
Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2022 4:38 pm

Re: The fate of the Pharisees

Post by Jair »

Having recently read through several of Rene Salm’s blog posts on Yeshu ha Notsri, he often talked about the differences between the Pharisees and the Sadducees in the first century BC. It’s the first time I’ve ever read that the Pharisees were considered to be the more “liberal” of the sects. I thought that fascinating. I wonder what other resources there are on that period of Jewish history.
User avatar
DCHindley
Posts: 3434
Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 9:53 am
Location: Ohio, USA

Re: The fate of the Pharisees

Post by DCHindley »

See if you can find the revised English translation of E Schürer’s *The Jewish People in the Age of Jesus Christ*, translator/editors G Vermes, F Miller & M Black (et al).

The section that discusses the Pharisees and Sadducees is in vol. II, pages 388-414. On the priesthood and temple worship, and also gentile participation in worship in Jerusalem, pages 237-313. The Essenes pp 555-574. Therapeutae, pp 593. Fourth Philosophy, pp 598ff.

Then there is the PDF I had previously posted that summarizes (in English translation) what the Jewish authors Philo & Josephus, and the Christian authors Hippolytus, Epiphanius & Eusebius, had to say about Essenes, Pharisees, Sadducees, Judas' 4th Philosophy & Therapeutae.

viewtopic.php?p=80820#p80820

DCH
Emil Schürer, The History of the Jewish people in the age of Jesus Christ

Vol I (1), 1973, ISBN 0567022420, 614 pages:
1. Scope and Purpose of Work
2. Auxiliary Sciences (Archaeology, Geography, Chronology, Numismatics, Epigraphy)
3. The Sources (Books of Maccabees, Fragments of Lost sources, Josephus, Greek & Latin Writers, Rabbinic Lit, Mss from the Judean Desert)
4. Religious Crisis and Revolution
5. Judas Maccabaeus
6. Jonathan
7. Simon
8. John Hyrcanus
9. Aristobulus
10. Alexander Jannaeus
11. Alexandra
12. Aristobulus II
13. Hyrcanus II & Rise of Antipater & his Sons Phasael and Herod
14. Antigonus
15. Herod the Great
16. Disturbances after Herod's Death
17. From Death of Herod the Great to Agrippa I: the Sons of Herod Philip, Antipas, Archelaeus, Judea under Roman Governors, Excursus on The Census of Quirinius and Excursus on Josephus on Jesus and James
18. Agrippa I
19. The Roman Governors and Excursus on Agrippa II
20. The Great War with Rome
21. From Destruction of Jerusalem to Downfall of Bar Kokhba
Appendices on History of Chalcis, Ituraea & Abilene, History of the Nabatean Kings, Features of the Jewish Calendar, Hebrew Coins, Parallel years of the Olympic, Seleucid & Christian Eras, The Seleucids, The Hasmonean Family, The Herodian Family.

Vol II (2), 1979, ISBN 0567022439, 606 pages:
22. The Cultural Setting
23. Political Institutions (Hellenic Cities, Jewish Region, Sanhedrin, The High Priests)
24. Priesthood and Temple Worship
Appendix. Gentile Participation in Worship at Jerusalem
25. Torah Scholarship
26. Pharisees & Sadducees
27. School & Synagogue
28. Life & Law
29. Messianism (Old & New, Historical Survey, Systemic Presentation)
Appendix a. The Suffering Messiah
Appendix b. The Qumran Messiahs & Messianism
30. The Essenes (of Literature and the Qumran Community form the DSS)
Appendix a. The Therapeutae
Appendix b. The Fourth Philosophy

Vol III.1 (3, part 1), 1986, ISBN 0567022447, first 704 pages:
31. Judaism in the Diaspora (Geo Survey, Community Organization & Constitution, Civic & Religious Life, Gentiles and Judaism such as 'God Fearers' and Proselytes)
32. Jewish Literature Composed in Hebrew or Aramaic (very detailed overviews by type)
33a. Jewish Literature Composed in Greek (again, very detailed overviews)

Vol III.2 (3, part 2), 1987, ISBN 0567093735, pp 705-1015 (311 pages):
33b. Jewish Literature of which the Original Language is Uncertain (did I mention that the overview is very detailed?)
34. The Jewish Philosopher Philo
Indexes for all volumes (Names & Subjects, Greek Word List, Hebrew & Aramaic Word List)
StephenGoranson
Posts: 2495
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2015 2:10 am

Re: The fate of the Pharisees

Post by StephenGoranson »

DCHindley gave excellent sources. To add a small comment, rabbinic literature (at least portions of it) appears to agree that Pharisees were lest strict in legal interpretations than Sadducees (for instance in their comparison of Hillel and Shammai, taken, more or less, historically or not linked originally with those names, to be representatives). Also, it may be useful to remember the changes over time. The Rabbis (at least some of them) have been called "heirs of the Pharisees." The Sadducees, apparently a smaller group than Pharisees even in second temple times (before 70), may have become less influential after the temple was destroyed. So some Christian writers may have known less about Sadducees and may have taken Pharisees and Rabbis as more or less the same thing. Maybe.
Germanicus_C
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2022 10:51 am

Re: The fate of the Pharisees

Post by Germanicus_C »

[quote="Secret Alias" post_id=133833 time=1646349175 user_id=6998]
(Zakkai abbreviation of Zecharya)

No etymological link.
Zakkai comes from a root which means to clean or purify.
Zachar = to remember
[/quote]


Are you sure?

https://www.abarim-publications.com/Meaning/Zaccai.html

Pure: by cleansing the body after the soul is cleansed of sins ?

Greetings
Germanicus_C
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2022 10:51 am

Re: The fate of the Pharisees

Post by Germanicus_C »

StephenGoranson wrote: Sun Mar 06, 2022 8:06 am DCHindley gave excellent sources. To add a small comment, rabbinic literature (at least portions of it) appears to agree that Pharisees were lest strict in legal interpretations than Sadducees (for instance in their comparison of Hillel and Shammai, taken, more or less, historically or not linked originally with those names, to be representatives). Also, it may be useful to remember the changes over time. The Rabbis (at least some of them) have been called "heirs of the Pharisees." The Sadducees, apparently a smaller group than Pharisees even in second temple times (before 70), may have become less influential after the temple was destroyed. So some Christian writers may have known less about Sadducees and may have taken Pharisees and Rabbis as more or less the same thing. Maybe.
Has a study been made of the mutual relationship and influence
of the Tarsus Philosophy School ("Paul") and the Alexandrian (Plato) Philosophy School (Philo Judaeus) on Pharisee Philosophy?

(Josephus testifies that the Pharisee view resembles the Stoic).
Germanicus_C
Posts: 22
Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2022 10:51 am

Re: The fate of the Pharisees

Post by Germanicus_C »

Josephus, Sadduc, Paul, Jesus all Pharisees?
Could this possibly indicate something?
Post Reply