so injil is not the 27 books of the new testament, it is suppose to be a revealation.
how does the koran understand injeel and kitab?
how does the koran understand injeel and kitab?
so injil is not the 27 books of the new testament, it is suppose to be a revealation.
Re: how does the koran understand injeel and kitab?
I would like to learn more about korans origins from a historical perspective
I'm curious if the author of this piece is biased.
On one side his slide he says academic study of religion presumes naturalism ( no causes outside nature) however he also says it would be wrong to view koran as not a miracle.
I get it would be outside the scope of determining if a miracle occured without evidence. But if one is looking at a piece of evidence im unsure why analyzing it to see if there is anything outside the laws of nature to justify it being a miracle or not.
I'm curious if the author of this piece is biased.
On one side his slide he says academic study of religion presumes naturalism ( no causes outside nature) however he also says it would be wrong to view koran as not a miracle.
I get it would be outside the scope of determining if a miracle occured without evidence. But if one is looking at a piece of evidence im unsure why analyzing it to see if there is anything outside the laws of nature to justify it being a miracle or not.