I know about at least 2: the "Book of Judith" and the "Book of Tobit", which are in Catholics' bibles but not in Jews' scriptures.neilgodfrey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 11:50 amDid not Jews also write fiction without any historical basis for the narratives?maryhelena wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 4:39 am It is not an assumption to maintain that there is a historical reflection in the gospel Jesus story. Logic requires that it is there - all the more so as its a very Jewish story.
Historicity's Problems And Theudas As Our Only Candidate; 4 Genuine Historical Identifications
Re: Historicity's Problems And Theudas As Our Only Candidate; 4 Genuine Historical Identifications
- maryhelena
- Posts: 2950
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 11:22 pm
- Location: England
Re: Historicity's Problems And Theudas As Our Only Candidate; 4 Genuine Historical Identifications
Yep, they wrote the Adam and Eve story...... so?neilgodfrey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 11:50 amDid not Jews also write fiction without any historical basis for the narratives?maryhelena wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 4:39 am It is not an assumption to maintain that there is a historical reflection in the gospel Jesus story. Logic requires that it is there - all the more so as its a very Jewish story.
Neil.... we have a gospel Jesus myth story. A story that has influenced western culture. It is that story that is the focus not another story. It is that story that has been called "the greatest story ever told". It is a story that people have died for. It is a story people have killed for. It's a story that continues to hold millions in its grasp.
Yes, people believe nonsense, they believe in imaginary friends. But that, surely, is the reason to attempt to ground Christian origins on a historical basis. Delusion can't be overcome by offering an otherworldly outer space story.
Exchanging a historical gospel Jesus for a cosmic Jesus is to shortchange oneself. We let go of reality at our peril. Jewish thought may indeed have reached for the stars, reached for philosophical insights and development...... but not at the expense of surrendering their firm standing on the ground under their feet. We would be doing the gospel writers a disservice to assume they did.
- neilgodfrey
- Posts: 6161
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:08 pm
Re: Historicity's Problems And Theudas As Our Only Candidate; 4 Genuine Historical Identifications
Have not people also died and killed for false beliefs? for fantasies? for ideas that have no basis in reality?maryhelena wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 1:38 pm
Yes, people believe nonsense, they believe in imaginary friends. But that, surely, is the reason to attempt to ground Christian origins on a historical basis. Delusion can't be overcome by offering an otherworldly outer space story.
- maryhelena
- Posts: 2950
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 11:22 pm
- Location: England
Re: Historicity's Problems And Theudas As Our Only Candidate; 4 Genuine Historical Identifications
Indeed they have. Therefore...... if we care about the danger that has arisen due to interpretations of the gospel Jesus story.... we will seek a historical basis for the origin of that story. A historical basis that would, as it were, move the interpretative dial away from imaginary friends and towards flesh and blood.neilgodfrey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 1:45 pmHave not people also died and killed for false beliefs? for fantasies? for ideas that have no basis in reality?maryhelena wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 1:38 pm
Yes, people believe nonsense, they believe in imaginary friends. But that, surely, is the reason to attempt to ground Christian origins on a historical basis. Delusion can't be overcome by offering an otherworldly outer space story.
- neilgodfrey
- Posts: 6161
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:08 pm
Re: Historicity's Problems And Theudas As Our Only Candidate; 4 Genuine Historical Identifications
Didn't you say the gospel story has its power because it has a historical basis? Or did I misunderstand you?maryhelena wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 2:03 pmIndeed they have. Therefore...... if we care about the danger that has arisen due to interpretations of the gospel Jesus story.... we will seek a historical basis for the origin of that story. A historical basis that would, as it were, move the interpretative dial away from imaginary friends and towards flesh and blood.neilgodfrey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 1:45 pmHave not people also died and killed for false beliefs? for fantasies? for ideas that have no basis in reality?maryhelena wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 1:38 pm
Yes, people believe nonsense, they believe in imaginary friends. But that, surely, is the reason to attempt to ground Christian origins on a historical basis. Delusion can't be overcome by offering an otherworldly outer space story.
If people die because it has a historical basis -- and that historical basis is what gives the story its power for people to die for -- then will not people still die for it, just as much as they die for fantasies?
- neilgodfrey
- Posts: 6161
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:08 pm
Re: Historicity's Problems And Theudas As Our Only Candidate; 4 Genuine Historical Identifications
The idea of Christians dying for the gospel is not because the gospel is based in history, but because they believe Jesus was raised from the dead and they will be raised, too, if they maintain their faith, even to death. I don't think any notion of historical truth to the story makes any difference.
- maryhelena
- Posts: 2950
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 11:22 pm
- Location: England
Re: Historicity's Problems And Theudas As Our Only Candidate; 4 Genuine Historical Identifications
And the quote of where I said any such thing ?neilgodfrey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 2:10 pmDidn't you say the gospel story has its power because it has a historical basis? Or did I misunderstand you?maryhelena wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 2:03 pmIndeed they have. Therefore...... if we care about the danger that has arisen due to interpretations of the gospel Jesus story.... we will seek a historical basis for the origin of that story. A historical basis that would, as it were, move the interpretative dial away from imaginary friends and towards flesh and blood.neilgodfrey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 1:45 pmHave not people also died and killed for false beliefs? for fantasies? for ideas that have no basis in reality?maryhelena wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 1:38 pm
Yes, people believe nonsense, they believe in imaginary friends. But that, surely, is the reason to attempt to ground Christian origins on a historical basis. Delusion can't be overcome by offering an otherworldly outer space story.
Quote please of where I inferred that 'people die because it (the gospel Jesus myth) has a historical basis ?
If people die because it has a historical basis -- and that historical basis is what gives the story its power for people to die for -- then will not people still die for it, just as much as they die for fantasies?
People have died due to their interpretation of the gospel story - an interpretation of the gospel Jesus myth that the gospel story is history. They died for their belief in the historicity of the gospel Jesus myth.
Last edited by maryhelena on Tue Apr 26, 2022 10:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- maryhelena
- Posts: 2950
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 11:22 pm
- Location: England
Re: Historicity's Problems And Theudas As Our Only Candidate; 4 Genuine Historical Identifications
Indeed - people died for their belief in the historicity of the story.neilgodfrey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 2:12 pm The idea of Christians dying for the gospel is not because the gospel is based in history, but because they believe Jesus was raised from the dead and they will be raised, too, if they maintain their faith, even to death. I don't think any notion of historical truth to the story makes any difference.
Whether people would be prepared to die for the story knowing that the story is not history, that it is an allegory - well now - what have they to gain? Gone would be their notion of joining a resurrected gospel Jesus in heaven...
One is not going to get people to focus on terra-firm by offering them Jesus in outer space.......
- neilgodfrey
- Posts: 6161
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:08 pm
Re: Historicity's Problems And Theudas As Our Only Candidate; 4 Genuine Historical Identifications
I really don't want to go back over earlier comments but I'm sorry if I misunderstood you. I thought you were claiming that the gospel story had power because it was grounded in history, that a myth would have no such power.maryhelena wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 10:16 pmAnd the quote of where I said any such thing ?neilgodfrey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 2:10 pmDidn't you say the gospel story has its power because it has a historical basis? Or did I misunderstand you?maryhelena wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 2:03 pmIndeed they have. Therefore...... if we care about the danger that has arisen due to interpretations of the gospel Jesus story.... we will seek a historical basis for the origin of that story. A historical basis that would, as it were, move the interpretative dial away from imaginary friends and towards flesh and blood.neilgodfrey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 1:45 pmHave not people also died and killed for false beliefs? for fantasies? for ideas that have no basis in reality?maryhelena wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 1:38 pm
Yes, people believe nonsense, they believe in imaginary friends. But that, surely, is the reason to attempt to ground Christian origins on a historical basis. Delusion can't be overcome by offering an otherworldly outer space story.Quote please of where I inferred that 'people die because it (the gospel Jesus myth) has a historical basis ?
If people die because it has a historical basis -- and that historical basis is what gives the story its power for people to die for -- then will not people still die for it, just as much as they die for fantasies?
People have died due to their interpretation of the gospel story - an interpretation of the gospel Jesus myth that the gospel story is history. They died for their belief in the historicity of the gospel Jesus myth.
By the way, I don't know anyone who has ever argued that Christians died for something they knew to be a myth. I think you are misunderstanding my position now.
- maryhelena
- Posts: 2950
- Joined: Tue Oct 08, 2013 11:22 pm
- Location: England
Re: Historicity's Problems And Theudas As Our Only Candidate; 4 Genuine Historical Identifications
OK - lets call an end to this exchange as it's not becoming productive......neilgodfrey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 11:11 pmI really don't want to go back over earlier comments but I'm sorry if I misunderstood you. I thought you were claiming that the gospel story had power because it was grounded in history, that a myth would have no such power.maryhelena wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 10:16 pmAnd the quote of where I said any such thing ?neilgodfrey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 2:10 pmDidn't you say the gospel story has its power because it has a historical basis? Or did I misunderstand you?maryhelena wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 2:03 pmIndeed they have. Therefore...... if we care about the danger that has arisen due to interpretations of the gospel Jesus story.... we will seek a historical basis for the origin of that story. A historical basis that would, as it were, move the interpretative dial away from imaginary friends and towards flesh and blood.neilgodfrey wrote: ↑Tue Apr 26, 2022 1:45 pm
Have not people also died and killed for false beliefs? for fantasies? for ideas that have no basis in reality?Quote please of where I inferred that 'people die because it (the gospel Jesus myth) has a historical basis ?
If people die because it has a historical basis -- and that historical basis is what gives the story its power for people to die for -- then will not people still die for it, just as much as they die for fantasies?
People have died due to their interpretation of the gospel story - an interpretation of the gospel Jesus myth that the gospel story is history. They died for their belief in the historicity of the gospel Jesus myth.
By the way, I don't know anyone who has ever argued that Christians died for something they knew to be a myth. I think you are misunderstanding my position now.
I'll leave you to your literary interpretations of the NT and I'll keep my focus on digging down into Hasmonean/Jewish history; a history that is the historical nucleus from which the gospel Jesus story arose. The difference between you and I seems to be that whereas I'm prepared to take on a 'cosmic' Christ element I don't see, on your side, eagerness to take on board an historical element to the gospel Jesus story. Literary interpretations are all interesting but they don't answer the 'why' question about the creation of the story. Historical sources - indeed - and we have two important Jewish sources - Philo and Josephus. It is their writing that needs to be dissected if we are ever to understand the historical origins of what became early christianity.