Page 2 of 6

Re: Were the things according to scriptures really thought to have happened?

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2023 7:10 am
by Kunigunde Kreuzerin
ABuddhist wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 4:07 am
MrMacSon wrote: Mon Apr 17, 2023 6:10 pm The NIV has an alternative for the end:
everyone whose names have not been written from the creation of the world in the book of life belonging to the Lamb who was slain [will worship the beast]

I would not trust the NIV. See https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/ ... rsion-niv/ for why.
Grammatically both meanings are possible in Revelation 13:8. The interpretative translation of the NIV is consistent with Revelation 17:8, which states that the names have not been written in the book of life since the foundation of the world. There is no lamb in 17:8.

Re: Were the things according to scriptures really thought to have happened?

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2023 7:16 am
by mlinssen
Kunigunde Kreuzerin wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 7:10 am
ABuddhist wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 4:07 am
MrMacSon wrote: Mon Apr 17, 2023 6:10 pm The NIV has an alternative for the end:
everyone whose names have not been written from the creation of the world in the book of life belonging to the Lamb who was slain [will worship the beast]

I would not trust the NIV. See https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/ ... rsion-niv/ for why.
Grammatically both meanings are possible in Revelation 13:8. The interpretative translation of the NIV is consistent with Revelation 17:8, which states that the names have not been written in the book of life since the foundation of the world. There is no lamb in 17:8.
There is only one way to address issues like these, and that is via an Interlinear

Revelation 17:8 Τὸ (The) θηρίον (beast) ὃ (that) εἶδες (you saw) ἦν (was), καὶ (and) οὐκ (not) ἔστιν (is), καὶ (and) μέλλει (is about) ἀναβαίνειν (to come up) ἐκ (out of) τῆς (the) ἀβύσσου (abyss) καὶ (and) εἰς (into) ἀπώλειαν (destruction) ὑπάγει (go); καὶ (and) θαυμασθήσονται (will wonder) οἱ (those) κατοικοῦντες (dwelling) ἐπὶ (on) τῆς (the) γῆς (earth), ὧν (whose) οὐ (not) γέγραπται (are written) τὸ (-) ὄνομα (names) ἐπὶ (in) τὸ (the) βιβλίον (book) τῆς (-) ζωῆς (of life) ἀπὸ (from) καταβολῆς (the foundation) κόσμου (of the world), βλεπόντων (seeing) τὸ (the) θηρίον (beast) ὅτι (which) ἦν (was), καὶ (and) οὐκ (not) ἔστιν (is), καὶ (and yet) παρέσται (will be).

There's a likelihood that not all words here are faithfully translated either, so beware

Re: Were the things according to scriptures really thought to have happened?

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2023 11:32 am
by MrMacSon
ABuddhist wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 4:07 am
MrMacSon wrote: Mon Apr 17, 2023 6:10 pm The NIV has an alternative for the end:
everyone whose names have not been written from the creation of the world in the book of life belonging to the Lamb who was slain [will worship the beast]

I would not trust the NIV. See https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/ ... rsion-niv/ for why.
There's no passages frm Revelation on that webpage pointed out as having a problem in the NIV. So, I don't give a shit until you can come up with a legitimate concern

Re: Were the things according to scriptures really thought to have happened?

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2023 12:26 pm
by nightshadetwine
Peter Kirby wrote: Mon Apr 17, 2023 4:31 pm I agree. But I think Doherty on occasion disagrees, especially when he talks about Middle Platonism. There is at least one text that makes me wonder whether Doherty might have a point here. Revelation.
Peter Kirby wrote: Sun May 14, 2017 7:11 pm
Revelation 13.8
And all who dwell on the earth will worship him, everyone whose name has not been written in the book of life of the Lamb who has been slain from the foundation of the world.


Revelation 5.6-14:
6 And I saw between the throne (with the four living creatures) and the elders a Lamb standing, as if slain, having seven horns and seven eyes, which are the seven Spirits of God, sent out into all the earth. 7 And He came and took the book out of the right hand of Him who sat on the throne. 8 When He had taken the book, the four living creatures and the twenty-four elders fell down before the Lamb, each one holding a harp and golden bowls full of incense, which are the prayers of the saints. 9 And they sing a new song, saying, “Worthy are You to take the book and to break its seals; for You were slain, and purchased for God with Your blood men from every tribe and tongue and people and nation. 10 “You have made them to be a kingdom and priests to our God; and they will reign upon the earth.” 11 Then I looked, and I heard the voice of many angels around the throne and the living creatures and the elders; and the number of them was myriads of myriads, and thousands of thousands, 12 saying with a loud voice, “Worthy is the Lamb that was slain to receive power and riches and wisdom and might and honor and glory and blessing.” 13 And every created thing which is in heaven and on the earth and under the earth and on the sea, and all things in them, I heard saying, “To Him who sits on the throne, and to the Lamb, be blessing and honor and glory and dominion forever and ever.” 14 And the four living creatures kept saying, “Amen.” And the elders fell down and worshiped.

The Lamb here seems to have been slain in some kind of eternal way, visible in heaven.
The only other "myth" that I'm aware of that sounds similar to what Carrier says about Jesus being crucified in the lunar realm would be that of the Egyptian sun god who leaves the heavens/sky, enters the underworld, takes on flesh, becomes a corpse, is reborn/resurrected and transfigured, and then rises out of the underworld back to the heavens/sky. The Egyptians believed that the people in the underworld had physical bodies made of flesh. By taking on flesh, becoming a corpse, and resurrecting, the sun god becomes a model to the Egyptians as someone who conquers death. Just like Osiris, his conquering of death gives Egyptians hope that they will also be able to conquer death. The similarities between the stories of the sun god, Osiris, and Jesus are undeniable to me even though there are differences. What's interesting is that Plutarch associates the moon and the realm just below the moon with the underworld/Hades. So if you were to look at this story of the sun god from a Middle Platonic perspective, then his death and resurrection/rebirth could be seen as happening in the lunar realm. Another interesting thing is that Paul seems to think that at the resurrection of Jesus the cosmos began a process of recreation. Every night when the sun god entered the underworld it was seen as a deconstruction of the cosmos and the morning sunrise/resurrection/rebirth out of the underworld was a recreation. This whole process of the sun god's journey through the underworld is constantly referred to as a "mystery" in Egyptian texts. While the sun god is in the underworld the dead are judged before Osiris and if they don't pass judgement they face punishment and then are annihilated which was considered to be a "second death". Some scholars have actually pointed out the possible influence of the myth of Isis and Horus on the woman in Revelation 12 who is being pursued by the dragon just as Isis is being pursued by Set. In the underworld, the serpent Apep/Apophis tries to prevent the rebirth of the sun god out of the womb of the sky goddess. So there's some similarities with Revelation also. The death and resurrection of Osiris was also associated with the phases of the moon.

Handbook of Egyptian Mythology (ABC-CLIO, 2002), Geraldine Pinch:
The mutilation and dismemberment of Osiris could also be linked to the lunar calendar (see under “Moon” in “Deities, Themes, and Concepts”). The full moon could represent both the complete body of Osiris and the complete eye of his son, Horus. Each month as the moon waned, the body of Osiris and the Eye of Horus were divided. Evil seemed to triumph, until the waxing of the moon “completed” these two symbols of beneficent power again. Periodic eclipses of the moon were explained by myths such as that of Seth taking the form of a black boar to swallow the eye of Horus and being forced to expel it again. Regular astronomical events such as the appearance of the morning star or the heliacal rising of Sirius also feature in Egyptian myth (see “Stars and Planets” in “Deities, Themes, and Concepts”), but by far the most significant heavenly phenomenon was the daily rising and setting of the sun.

The apparent movement of the sun across the sky was seen both as a life cycle and as a journey. The daily life cycle of the sun was more an extended metaphor than a narrative. The sun was said to be born each morning from the womb of the sky goddess, Nut. At dawn the sun was a child—a daily repetition of the emergence of the sun child during the First Time [beginning of creation]. At noon, the sun reached the peak of his strength and could be portrayed as a triumphant falcon. By evening he was an old man, virtually the only god to be shown as old. The common identification of the evening sun as Atum linked it with the myth of the creator growing weary and letting the world sink back into the nun. Sunset was equivalent to death, and the sun’s flesh and soul passed into the underworld. After moving through the underworld reviving its inhabitants with his light, the sun would be reborn. Each sunrise was a new beginning for the cosmos.
The Search for God in Ancient Egypt (Cornell University Press, 2001), Jan Assmann:
The nightly journey of the sun as a descensus ad inferos brought the sun god into constellations with the inhabitants of the netherworld, the transfigured dead. His light, and in particular his speech, awoke them from the sleep of death and allowed them to participate in the life-giving order that emanated from his course. But in this, the god himself experienced the form of existence of the transfigured dead and set an example for them by overcoming death. For in the depths of the night and the netherworld - and this was the most mysterious constellation of all - he united with Osiris, the son with the deceased father, the ba with the corpse, and from this union he received the strength for a fresh life cycle... The icon of sunset represents the cosmic process in such a way that it can be the archetype of the fate of the dead. It invests actions and events in the divine realm with a formulation that makes them comprehensible on the level of the mortuary cult. The same is true of the morning icon, which symbolizes the overcoming of death and the renewal of life, rebirth from the womb of the sky goddess. Connected with it are Isis and Nephthys, the divine mourning women, whose laments and transfigurations raise the dead into the morning constellation of the course of the sun... The icons give the course of the sun a form that makes it possible to relate it to the world of humankind, for they bring to light a meaning in the sun's course that is common to both levels, the cosmic level and that of the fate of the dead... Just as the icons of evening and morning sketch out the archetype of a successful outcome for individual's hopes for immortality, so the midday icon of overcoming the enemy lends archetypal form above all to society and its interest in health, life, and well-being... The course of the sun was at the same time the pulse-beat of the world, which filled the cosmos with life force by means of the cyclic defeat of the enemy and of death. The constellation that lent the clarity of an icon to this idea was that of Re and Osiris. In the depths of the night, they unite as father and son, as the day at dusk and dawn, and as the two aspects of plenitude of cosmic time that the Egyptians distinguished as neheh and djet.
The Ancient Egyptian Books of the Earth (ISD LLC, 2012), Joshua Aaron Roberson:
The right-hand group includes a burial mound, within which rests a large weeping eye and four “flesh” signs... A bearded mummy lies atop the mound, embraced by the “arms of Geb” (a.wj Gb). The mummy is identified as Re [the sun god] in the version of Khonsumes, and as “He Who Weeps” (sntw) in that of Ramesses VI. A text on the Khonsumes papyrus explains how the god goes to rest in the arms of Geb [the earth god], stating “the two arms guard the corpse of this god, which has not emerged from them.” A pair of praising figures, male and female, flank either side of the burial mound. The figures’ captions (“He/she of the wailing cry”; “He/she of lament”) identify them as mourners on behalf of the recumbent mummy, whom they attend... The figures again represent the revivification of the sun through immersion in chaos: the night barque descends from the preceding underworld pathway, down through the original mound of earth, which has emerged from the primordial ocean. The sun god then leaves the ordered cosmos for a brief sojourn in the unknowable, watery expanse of Nun. The papyrus of Djedkhonsuiusankh identifies the solar deity (equated with the deceased) at this critical juncture as a “possessor of mystery.”... It seems likely that the night barque must physically transform into the day barque while inside of Nun [primordial waters], just as the elderly sun god transforms into his own, rejuvenated form... the Great God, formerly a “possessor of mystery,” now acquires the epithet, “possessor of life.” The sun’s disappearance into the primordial waters may recall eschatological themes alluded to in the Book of the Dead. Such texts serve as a reminder of the delicate balance struck between ordered existence and dissolution into chaos—a balance predicated upon the continued rejuvenation of the sun within the same chaotic waters that will ultimately reabsorb the world... This same region is associated also with the primal waters of Nun, which the sun god must enter in order to be reborn... In this diagram, the large mummiform figure at the center represents the union of Re and Osiris, which occurs at the midpoint of the solar journey, resulting in the formation of the giant god Re-Osiris, who stands in the eastern horizon, with his head in the heavens and his feet in the depths of the Underworld... The central mummified figure undoubtedly represented the mysterious union of Re and Osiris. This event is the very apotheosis of resurrection and the mythological model on which the king and, later, private individuals hung their hope for rebirth.
The Ancient Egyptian Netherworld Books (SBL Press, 2018) John Coleman Darnell, Colleen Manassa Darnell:
Several scenes within the Netherworld Books describe the destruction and accompanying re-creation of time. The interaction of space and time in the Netherworld Books ultimately leads to the re-creation of the cosmos each night. As the sun descends into the depth of the Nun-waters and visits his Osirian corpse, time itself is renewed, enabling the resurrection of the dead king and indeed all blessed dead... The punishment of enemies becomes one of the chief themes of Hour 11 of the Book of the Hidden Chamber, and an appropriate landscape of fiery pits appears in the lowest register... This corresponds to the concept of creation from de(con)struction that finds such emphasis in the book of Caverns- the "atomizing" of the self results in a recreation of the blessed dead but leaves the several portions of the dismembered damned to cook in the fires of the Netherworldy deities... One of the few consistent topographical themes of the Netherworld Books does appear within Hour 2 of the Book of Gates, as it does throughout the Book of Caverns: the punishment of the damned is executed in the lowest register of the hour, in the bowels of each division of the night... The Lake of Fire in Hour 3 of the Book of Gates (Scene 10) has an interesting dual nature: it provides refreshing water for the blessed dead, but a blasting flame against the damned... Following Hour 5 is an interior space, the Judgement Hall of Osiris... In the final three hours of the Book of Gates, Re approaches the eastern horizon of heaven as he repeatedly battles the chaos serpent Apep.
The Mind of Egypt: History and Meaning in the Time of the Pharaohs, Jan Assmann:
The spread of the religion of Osiris and, inextricably bound up with it, the emergence of a universal Judgment of the Dead constituted the most significant new paradigm in the Egyptian history of meaning... Every dead person hoped to find similar vindication after death and to follow Osiris into the realm of immortality... The Egyptian concept of the verdict passed on the dead bears some comparison to the early Christian notion of divine judgment as set out in chapter 25 of the Gospel According to St. Matthew. Instead of the Egyptian tribunal, the gospel offers the Last Judgment, instead of individual lifetimes the lifetime of the world; the "House of Osiris" into which the vindicated Egyptian dead were admitted is replaced by the Kingdom of God. And here too, admission to everlasting bliss depends upon the dead person's compliance with the norms of human fellowship; in the hereafter, those transgressions not susceptible of retribution on earth are accorded the ultimate sanction of eternal damnation...

It is the salvational efficacy of this process that gives it meaning in the first place and that marks the linguistic accompaniment as an interpretation. Of central moment is the idea of a dual overcoming: the overcoming of evil, personified by Apopis threatening the bark with standstill, and the overcoming of death. Both are manifestations of chaos, two aspects of the same process. The overcoming of evil is the active, transitive aspect, directed at the external world. In this dynamic, the sun god figures as the god of the world, whose word creates order, speaks law, ensures livelihood, and "drives out evil."...The overcoming of death is the passive or intransitive aspect of the nightly journey. This process takes the form of a life span that the sun god traverses, aging and dying in order to be reborn. The mystery of solar rebirth is in fact the central salvational element in Egyptian religion... The visual recognition of the circuit of the sun becomes an act of understanding by identification. Human beings recognize themselves in the cosmos. It is their death that is overcome...

Re: Were the things according to scriptures really thought to have happened?

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2023 12:47 pm
by Peter Kirby
(emphasis added)
nightshadetwine wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 12:26 pm the Egyptian sun god who leaves the heavens/sky, enters the underworld, takes on flesh, becomes a corpse, is reborn/resurrected and transfigured, and then rises out of the underworld back to the heavens/sky. The Egyptians believed that the people in the underworld had physical bodies made of flesh. By taking on flesh, becoming a corpse, and resurrecting, the sun god becomes a model to the Egyptians as someone who conquers death. Just like Osiris, his conquering of death gives Egyptians hope that they will also be able to conquer death. The similarities between the stories of the sun god, Osiris, and Jesus are undeniable to me even though there are differences. What's interesting is that Plutarch associates the moon and the realm just below the moon with the underworld/Hades.
Interesting. The closest match for this is what I was saying.
Peter Kirby wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2015 3:51 pm (1) Where is Jesus from?

ὁ δεύτερος ἄνθρωπος ἐξ οὐρανοῦ (1Co 15:47 BGT) or πρωτότοκος πάσης κτίσεως (Col 1:15 BGT)
'the second man is from heaven' or 'the firstborn of all creation'

(2) So, where exactly did this Jesus descend, when he did so in order to die and get raised up from the dead? Where'd he ascend from?

τὴν ἄβυσσον (Rom 10:7 BGT) or τὰ κατώτερα [μέρη] τῆς γῆς (Eph 4:9 BGT)
'the abyss' or 'the lower parts of the earth'
Peter Kirby wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2015 1:46 am (1) Do 'the abyss' and 'the sky' qualify as a part of the Greek conception of earth? As a matter of fact, sometimes they do [yes, citation needed], especially when contrasting the concept of earth with the concept of heaven; 'earth' in that case contains all of the sky, the surface of the land and the water, and the deep places of the earth (everything below the orbit of the moon). In which case, what you may have done is just proven that Jesus had entered into heaven, from somewhere else (this Greek idea of 'earth' being the only real option), in two different ways (recalling the earlier thread on that same subject).

...

(v) Let us offer as a somewhat speculative hypothesis here, then--that the glittering assertions like Galatians 3:13 and Colossians 2:14 come from a background understanding of the achievement of Jesus Christ, part of which is: the body of flesh that the innocent man of heaven took upon himself was subject to temptation, was liable to sin, had the claim of the law on it, and so could conceivably be condemned to a final death like any other body.

By killing that instead, all the powers and principalities in the dominion of death who have a claim of death on men (i.e., Hades, sheol, the abyss, etc.), because of the sin of Adam and the sins of people generally, have been paid in full by the sacrifice of this body, by them, in disguise. They would not have accepted it if they knew it would cancel out the debt of humanity! Yet it does, but only if somebody joins Christ symbolically in his death by baptism and calls on him as lord; then they become part of the body of Christ and can rise together with him when he comes at the end of days. This is also known as the ransom theory of atonement, or simply, the belief in a literal 'redemption' of mankind, buying them back after paying for their individual debts of death with the single 'once and for all' death sacrifice of the son of god.

There is a mythology here. It has a beginning, a middle, and an end. There is a series of events in the middle. It's every bit as episodic (first this, then that, then the other) as Burton Mack's, J. D. Crossan's, Jimmy Dunn's, NT Wright's, or whoever's idea of what early Christians believed. There is a definite sense of progression in the phases where Jesus has not yet taken on the form of flesh; when Jesus was subject to temptation (immediately, I suppose) and yet became obedient unto death (did not resist his mission and had faith in God the Father); when Jesus was killed in the form of flesh; when Jesus was buried; when Jesus rose from the dead with his spiritual body; when Jesus preached to the spirits in hell; when Jesus entered into heaven; when Jesus officiated his own blood offering in the heavenly temple; when Jesus appeared to men and told them to spread his gospel; when Jesus was seated at the right hand of the father; when Jesus will come and be manifested 'again', materially this time, not just with apostles seeing him, and with the resurrection of the dead in Christ. (This is a composite picture based on several epistles, but we must assume that whatever picture was in mind for the early Christians, it was a coherent one that had its own internal logic; we must tease it out based on incidental references here and there.)

Re: Were the things according to scriptures really thought to have happened?

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2023 1:07 pm
by ABuddhist
MrMacSon wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 11:32 am
ABuddhist wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 4:07 am
MrMacSon wrote: Mon Apr 17, 2023 6:10 pm The NIV has an alternative for the end:
everyone whose names have not been written from the creation of the world in the book of life belonging to the Lamb who was slain [will worship the beast]

I would not trust the NIV. See https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/ ... rsion-niv/ for why.
There's no passages frm Revelation on that webpage pointed out as having a problem in the NIV. So, I don't give a shit until you can come up with a legitimate concern
With all due respect, your answer ignores the following things:

1. My general point was that the NIV is an untrustworthy translation, which you do not contest. For this reason, I am unwilling to trust any argument citing the NIV as a basis for an argument.

2. The webpage does not claim to be an exhaustive documentation of every error within the NIV - although it is growing. Rather, it describes the NIV's biases and provides ample evidence why the NIV should not be trusted.

3. I enquired here https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/ ... mment-8743 about whether the translation which you cited was misleading, and the webpage's owner/writer, to my joy, replied here https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/ ... mment-8744 by not dismissing my claim as ridiculous but as requiring moree research.

4. The NIV differs from the other translation which we have been citing, and because the NIV is generally untrustworthy as a translation, surely it is right to be wary when using it in contradiction to another translation. After all, we should not trust untrustworthy sources when they contradict trustworthy sources.

I hope that your day and life are going well - may you be calm and happy and avoid rudeness.

Re: Were the things according to scriptures really thought to have happened?

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2023 2:40 pm
by nightshadetwine
Peter Kirby wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 12:47 pm Interesting. The closest match for this is what I was saying.
Peter Kirby wrote: Tue Apr 07, 2015 3:51 pm (1) Where is Jesus from?

ὁ δεύτερος ἄνθρωπος ἐξ οὐρανοῦ (1Co 15:47 BGT) or πρωτότοκος πάσης κτίσεως (Col 1:15 BGT)
'the second man is from heaven' or 'the firstborn of all creation'

(2) So, where exactly did this Jesus descend, when he did so in order to die and get raised up from the dead? Where'd he ascend from?

τὴν ἄβυσσον (Rom 10:7 BGT) or τὰ κατώτερα [μέρη] τῆς γῆς (Eph 4:9 BGT)
'the abyss' or 'the lower parts of the earth'
Peter Kirby wrote: Thu Jul 09, 2015 1:46 am (1) Do 'the abyss' and 'the sky' qualify as a part of the Greek conception of earth? As a matter of fact, sometimes they do [yes, citation needed], especially when contrasting the concept of earth with the concept of heaven; 'earth' in that case contains all of the sky, the surface of the land and the water, and the deep places of the earth (everything below the orbit of the moon). In which case, what you may have done is just proven that Jesus had entered into heaven, from somewhere else (this Greek idea of 'earth' being the only real option), in two different ways (recalling the earlier thread on that same subject).

...

(v) Let us offer as a somewhat speculative hypothesis here, then--that the glittering assertions like Galatians 3:13 and Colossians 2:14 come from a background understanding of the achievement of Jesus Christ, part of which is: the body of flesh that the innocent man of heaven took upon himself was subject to temptation, was liable to sin, had the claim of the law on it, and so could conceivably be condemned to a final death like any other body.

By killing that instead, all the powers and principalities in the dominion of death who have a claim of death on men (i.e., Hades, sheol, the abyss, etc.), because of the sin of Adam and the sins of people generally, have been paid in full by the sacrifice of this body, by them, in disguise. They would not have accepted it if they knew it would cancel out the debt of humanity! Yet it does, but only if somebody joins Christ symbolically in his death by baptism and calls on him as lord; then they become part of the body of Christ and can rise together with him when he comes at the end of days. This is also known as the ransom theory of atonement, or simply, the belief in a literal 'redemption' of mankind, buying them back after paying for their individual debts of death with the single 'once and for all' death sacrifice of the son of god.

There is a mythology here. It has a beginning, a middle, and an end. There is a series of events in the middle. It's every bit as episodic (first this, then that, then the other) as Burton Mack's, J. D. Crossan's, Jimmy Dunn's, NT Wright's, or whoever's idea of what early Christians believed. There is a definite sense of progression in the phases where Jesus has not yet taken on the form of flesh; when Jesus was subject to temptation (immediately, I suppose) and yet became obedient unto death (did not resist his mission and had faith in God the Father); when Jesus was killed in the form of flesh; when Jesus was buried; when Jesus rose from the dead with his spiritual body; when Jesus preached to the spirits in hell; when Jesus entered into heaven; when Jesus officiated his own blood offering in the heavenly temple; when Jesus appeared to men and told them to spread his gospel; when Jesus was seated at the right hand of the father; when Jesus will come and be manifested 'again', materially this time, not just with apostles seeing him, and with the resurrection of the dead in Christ. (This is a composite picture based on several epistles, but we must assume that whatever picture was in mind for the early Christians, it was a coherent one that had its own internal logic; we must tease it out based on incidental references here and there.)
Yeah, Everything you wrote here reminded me of the story of the sun god's journey through the underworld and back into the heavens. Even though I think there was most likely a historical Jesus, I still think this "mystery" story of Osiris and the sun god influenced the mystery cults and stories about Jesus whether directly or indirectly. By conquering death in some form, all these deities set an example for their followers. In The Golden Ass by Apuleius, the character Lucius is initiated into the mysteries of Isis by performing a ritual journey to the underworld and back. He seems to be reenacting the sun god's and Osiris's death and resurrection similar to how Christians reenact the death and resurrection of Jesus in baptism.

"Death and Initiation in the Funerary Religion of Ancient Egypt", Jan Assmann in Religion and Philosophy in Ancient Egypt (Yale Egyptological Studies 3, 1989):
In the initiation of Lucius, the voyage through the underworld stands for a symbolic death, followed on the next morning by his resurrection as the sun-god: adorned with a palm wreath, he appears to the cheering crowd, just as the justified deceased at the judgement of the dead... No one doubts that the initiation rites of the Isis mysteries, as Apuleius ventures to describe them, are deeply rooted in the uniquely elaborated rituals and conceptions of Egyptian funerary religion. The same holds true for other initiation rituals.
Death and Salvation in Ancient Egypt (Cornell University Press, 2011), Jan Assmann:
We now understand why the embalming ritual had to portray the corpse not just as a lifeless body but as a dismembered one... The myth dramatized this condition, telling how Seth slew his brother Osiris, tore his body into pieces, and scattered his limbs throughout all of Egypt. In the embalming ritual, this myth was played out for each deceased person, even if he had in no way been killed and dismembered but rather had died a peaceful, natural death... In Egyptian mortuary belief, Osiris was the prototype of every deceased individual. Everyone would become Osiris in death and be endowed with life by Isis... The text in question deals with the initiation of Lucius into the mysteries of Isis, as related by Apuleius in his novel "The Golden Ass.” The scene is not Egypt but Cenchreae, the harbor of Corinth, where there was an Isis sanctuary. In the Hellenistic Isis religion, the goddess embodied her adherents’ hope for eternal life, and she brought a great deal from her Egyptian past to this role. It was she who had awakened Osiris to new life through the power of her magical spells. And since, according to Egyptian belief, every individual became an Osiris by means of the mortuary rituals, his hope for immortality depended on Isis as well. There is good reason to think that ancient Egyptian burial customs lived on in the Hellenistic Isis mysteries, though in the latter case, they were enacted and interpreted not as a burial of the deceased but as an initiation of the living... Lucius is initiated into the mysteries of the netherworld. He carries out the descensus of the sun god, descending into the netherworld and beholding the sun at midnight. With these sentences, we cannot help but think of the Books of the Netherworld...

In accordance with the image of death as mystery, the deceased not only crossed over, or returned, to the netherworld, he was initiated into it. In their rubrics, many spells of the Book of the Dead identify themselves as initiations into the mysteries of the netherworld... In any event, the Egyptian texts say one thing clearly enough: that all rituals, and especially those centered on Osiris and the sun god, were cloaked in mystery. And it is also clear that there is a relationship between initiation into these (ritual) mysteries and life in the next world...
Cosmology & Eschatology in Jewish & Christian Apocalypticism (Brill, 1996), Adela Yarbro Collins:
In Romans 6: 1-14 the ritual of baptism is explicitly interpreted as a reenactment of the death and resurrection of Jesus in which the baptized person appropriates the significance of that death for him or herself. In this understanding of the ritual, the experience of the Christian is firmly and vividly grounded in the story of the death and resurrection of Christ. These qualities of reenactment of a foundational story and the identification of the participant with the protagonist of the story are strikingly reminiscent of what is known about the initiation rituals of certain mystery religions, notably the Eleusinian mysteries and the Isis mysteries.

Re: Were the things according to scriptures really thought to have happened?

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2023 3:54 pm
by MrMacSon
ABuddhist wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 1:07 pm
MrMacSon wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 11:32 am
ABuddhist wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 4:07 am
MrMacSon wrote: Mon Apr 17, 2023 6:10 pm The NIV has an alternative for the end:
everyone whose names have not been written from the creation of the world in the book of life belonging to the Lamb who was slain [will worship the beast]

I would not trust the NIV. See https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/ ... rsion-niv/ for why.
There's no passages frm Revelation on that webpage pointed out as having a problem in the NIV. So, I don't give a shit until you can come up with a legitimate concern
With all due respect, your answer ignores the following things:

1. My general point was that the NIV is an untrustworthy translation, which you do not contest. For this reason, I am unwilling to trust any argument citing the NIV as a basis for an argument.

2. The webpage does not claim to be an exhaustive documentation of every error within the NIV - although it is growing. Rather, it describes the NIV's biases and provides ample evidence why the NIV should not be trusted.

3. I enquired here https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/ ... mment-8743 about whether the translation which you cited was misleading, and the webpage's owner/writer, to my joy, replied here https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/ ... mment-8744 by not dismissing my claim as ridiculous but as requiring moree research.

4. The NIV differs from the other translation which we have been citing, and because the NIV is generally untrustworthy as a translation, surely it is right to be wary when using it in contradiction to another translation. After all, we should not trust untrustworthy sources when they contradict trustworthy sources.

I hope that your day and life are going well - may you be calm and happy and avoid rudeness.

With undue respect, what the f..k does all this matter?

Seriously, My post is about an overview of some key tropes. Sure, there are different translations, eg. where book = scroll, as I have alluded to, but does any translation, or do translation issues, change what I've posted about??

Re: Were the things according to scriptures really thought to have happened?

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2023 4:39 pm
by ABuddhist
MrMacSon wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 3:54 pm
ABuddhist wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 1:07 pm
MrMacSon wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 11:32 am
ABuddhist wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 4:07 am
MrMacSon wrote: Mon Apr 17, 2023 6:10 pm The NIV has an alternative for the end:
everyone whose names have not been written from the creation of the world in the book of life belonging to the Lamb who was slain [will worship the beast]

I would not trust the NIV. See https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/ ... rsion-niv/ for why.
There's no passages frm Revelation on that webpage pointed out as having a problem in the NIV. So, I don't give a shit until you can come up with a legitimate concern
With all due respect, your answer ignores the following things:

1. My general point was that the NIV is an untrustworthy translation, which you do not contest. For this reason, I am unwilling to trust any argument citing the NIV as a basis for an argument.

2. The webpage does not claim to be an exhaustive documentation of every error within the NIV - although it is growing. Rather, it describes the NIV's biases and provides ample evidence why the NIV should not be trusted.

3. I enquired here https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/ ... mment-8743 about whether the translation which you cited was misleading, and the webpage's owner/writer, to my joy, replied here https://isthatinthebible.wordpress.com/ ... mment-8744 by not dismissing my claim as ridiculous but as requiring moree research.

4. The NIV differs from the other translation which we have been citing, and because the NIV is generally untrustworthy as a translation, surely it is right to be wary when using it in contradiction to another translation. After all, we should not trust untrustworthy sources when they contradict trustworthy sources.

I hope that your day and life are going well - may you be calm and happy and avoid rudeness.

With undue respect, what the f..k does all this matter?

Seriously, My post is about an overview of some key tropes. Sure, there are different translations, eg. where book = scroll, as I have alluded to, but does any translation, or do translation issues, change what I've posted about??
With all due respect, though, you undermine your argument when you cite an unreliable translation as a legitimate source.

For my part, I apologize for the fact that my initially pointing out that you were using an unreliable translation has gotten you so upset. I was not criticizing your conclusion or your other research.

Are you all right? Your using profanity is very out of character for you.

Re: Were the things according to scriptures really thought to have happened?

Posted: Tue Apr 18, 2023 11:50 pm
by MrMacSon
ABuddhist wrote: Tue Apr 18, 2023 4:39 pm you undermine your argument when you cite an unreliable translation as a legitimate source
FFS! I haven't made an argument. I've just highlighted some things. Out of interest. And for posterity.

Things that are very unlikely to be influenced by 'translation'.

You have not pointed out how or why my use of the NIV affects what I've highlighted. So, unless you can provide an actual argument, your point is moot ie. it's actually utterly pointless. And an annoying waste of my time to have to deal with.



eta:
The only difference between the version Peter gave and the NIV for Revelation 13.8 is the order of the clauses or points:
MrMacSon wrote: Mon Apr 17, 2023 6:10 pm
re Revelation 13.8

And all who dwell on the earth will worship him [the [first] beast who came out of the sea], everyone whose name has not been written in the book of life of the Lamb who has been slain from the foundation[/creation] of the world.

The NIV has an alternative for the end:

everyone whose names have not been written from the creation of the world in the book of life belonging to the Lamb who was slain [will worship the beast]



There's shapeshifting in the passages of Revelation I've highlighted.

Shortened here:


The Lion of the tribe of Judah, the Root of David, [who] triumphed...is able to open the scroll/book and its seven seals ... 'It' becomes "a Lamb standing as if slain, having seven horns and seven eyes which are the seven Spirits of God sent out into all the earth." It becomes a 'He' who came and took the book out of the right hand of 'Him' who sat on the throne ...

It was slain "to receive power and riches and wisdom and might and honor and glory and blessing"

After a woman, clothed with the sun, with the moon under her feet and a crown of twelve stars on her head...gave birth to a son who “will rule all the nations with an iron scepter” [Psalms 2:9 and 110:2] ... comes the salvation and the power and the kingdom of God and the authority of His Messiah ... by the blood of the Lamb and by The Word of...testimony ...

The Lamb [later appeared] standing on Mount Zion with 144,000 who had his name and his Father’s name written on their foreheads ... They follow the Lamb wherever he goes (they were purchased from among mankind and offered as firstfruits to God and the Lamb) ...
.

$2 says that is a pre- gospel-Jesus story


As it turns out, Revelation 13:8, which you've taken issue with (for some weird reason), is irrelevant to that story