Page 1 of 1

Principal argument against the priority of a Gentilizing Gospel (*Ev or Mark)

Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 3:39 am
by Giuseppe
A Gospel Jesus means essentially a Jesus crucified in Jerusalem. With disciples mourning his death in Jerusalem.

The centrality of Jerusalem (and the community found in it) could only increase as collateral effect.

With all the his means, it was impossible for a Gentilizer prevent a such collateral effect. It was impossible for a gentilizer not even predict a such collateral effect.

Hence it was impossible that a Gentilizer could have written the first gospel.


Therefore much probably neither *Ev nor Mark could be the first gospel in absolute terms.

Re: Principal argument against the priority of a Gentilizing Gospel (*Ev or Mark)

Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 3:44 am
by Giuseppe
So much you make a genius the presumed Gentilizer who would have written the first gospel, even more much you make him an idiot insofar he was unable to predict the obvious collateral effect from a story placing the Jesus's death in Jerusalem.

Re: Principal argument against the priority of a Gentilizing Gospel (*Ev or Mark)

Posted: Tue Sep 24, 2024 3:50 am
by Giuseppe
Obviously the argument is strong insofar you doubt that a historical Jesus existed or was crucified in Jerusalem. Because otherwise the centrality of Jerusalem is given as a brute datum.