Page 2 of 2

Re: ΙΣ as אִישׁ Revisited

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2024 12:32 pm
by Secret Alias
It is worth noting that any thought of arbitrariness accounting for Marcovich's correction of the surviving manuscript is removed when we realize that Charles Munier emended the text in the very same way. "Marcovich and Munier emend the text to have the sense: Jesus is a name which means, in Hebrew, 'man'; in Greek, 'saviour'. They suppose that 2A 5(6).4, to which they refer, has the sense 'Jesus is a name which signifies both “man” and “saviour” https://books.google.com/books?id=TFsVD ... 22&f=false The interpretation is no longer arbitrary. https://www.academia.edu/78235875/Remar ... tin_Martyr

Re: ΙΣ as אִישׁ Revisited

Posted: Thu Sep 26, 2024 7:54 pm
by Secret Alias
It's not just Origen in his letter to Africanus " «ἴς» δὲ τὸν ἄνδρα" but Eusebius "Πάλιν Ἑβραῖοι τὸν ἄνδρα ΙΣ καλοῦσι."