in defence of astrotheology

Discussion about the New Testament, apocrypha, gnostics, church fathers, Christian origins, historical Jesus or otherwise, etc.
User avatar
Leucius Charinus
Posts: 3041
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 4:23 pm
Location: memoriae damnatio

Re: in defence of astrotheology

Post by Leucius Charinus »

Bertie wrote:
Leucius Charinus wrote:I'd like to see some comments that address the evidence mentioned by Price (link above) in defence/support of astrotheology ....
  • Extracted and numbered from D.M. Murdock (Acharya S.), Christ in Egypt: The Horus-Jesus Connection.
    Reviewed by Robert M. Price


    (1) Hercules’ twelve labors surely mark his progress, as the sun, through the houses of the Zodiac;
    why do Jesus circumambient twelve disciples not mean the same thing? And so on.

    (2) The tale of Joseph and his brethren is already transparently a retelling of Osiris and Set.

    (3) The New Testament Lazarus story is another (Mary and Martha playing Isis and Nephthys).

    (4) And so is the story of Jesus (Mary Magdalene and the others as Isis and Nephthys).

    ...etc...
This is not "evidence". These are bare assertions.
I see them as assertions regarding Price's evaluation of the evidence.
Now, Price was writing a book review and is not necessarily expected to provide "evidence" and probably didn't see himself as needing to do so in that format.
Price has nevertheless evaluated these issues as being supportive of an astrotheological perspective.

In the ancient world the sun died in the evening and traversed the geocentric underworld to be resurrected again each day.
Furthermore, just eyeballing that list and working off of memory alone, I can recall a Jewish antecedent for most those items, and I'm betting if I checked the literature (which I can't do at this moment) I could find a Jewish antecedent for every single one of them. Perhaps some of those Jewish antecedents ultimately derive (through Babylon or other Ancient Near East sources or whatever) to some rudimentary astronomical observations.

But as I and several others tried to explain early on in this thread, it doesn't matter whether astronomical antecedents to Jewish belief exist; it matters whether early Christian writers were aware of those alleged astronomical antecedents. There is no evidence they were.
Didn't we find something in Revelations to do with precession? If so, granted, it could have been "lifted"/"copied" from another source. Yes it is just one small reference. But it does appear to exist. Why does it exist? Who inserted it into the text and why?

Which figures in the ancient world died in the evening and traversed the geocentric underworld to be resurrected again to life?

What's this called? A theme? The stories are not the same but the themes are similar from a number of sources.
Dying and Resurrected Saviour figures existed in antiquity and the model was cloned by the Christians.

So we pick up and examine the NT Bible and look for "evidence" that Jesus is being cast as the "Sun" - dying, traversing the Underworld and being resurrected to life. Do we find evidence for a Helios Jesus? It's not explicit in the plot of the text, but it is implicit in the theme? I think perhaps this is what Robert and Mimi and others may be defending. IDK.

However if it is the case that the defence of astrotheology is based on the themes in the NT, this is something that needs to be clarified and addressed. The immediate question is, if the theme of the NT is not astrotheological, then what is the [mainstream idea of a] theme? God's word? A Holy Writ? Jesus the Good battles the Devil on the pinnacles and wins?

What do you think on this question. What is the theme of the NT? (Not the plot, the theme)

(At the moment I would give the answer: "Don't fuck with the Romans. They crucified God. Be good Gentiles and pay tribute to Caesar. And as far as God goes, keep searching the NT and LXX scriptures, for in this dry boring dull and serious pile of bullshit thou shalt find the answers to why the meaning of life is not just 42.)




LC
A "cobbler of fables" [Augustine]; "Leucius is the disciple of the devil" [Decretum Gelasianum]; and his books "should be utterly swept away and burned" [Pope Leo I]; they are the "source and mother of all heresy" [Photius]
User avatar
Leucius Charinus
Posts: 3041
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 4:23 pm
Location: memoriae damnatio

Re: in defence of astrotheology

Post by Leucius Charinus »

neilgodfrey wrote:The reason I presented the more detailed definition was to try to bring out the implications of that word "theology" in "astrotheology" and to stress the keyword "worship" in the definitions that you cite here.

I'm afraid I don't understand how we can validly include any interest or thoughts about astronomy in the definition (if that's what you mean?).
Yes it's precisely what I mean, as stated clearly in the definition furnished. Your focus on "theology" and "worship" seems to want to sweep the "astronomy" and the "observation and measurement" under the carpet. I don't see how we can validly preclude any and all astronomical interests.
Interest and literary allusions and observations and calculations are not worship. I would compare it with, say, war-making activities and the worship of a war-god. The former could be carried on without any thought of the latter.
The only knowledge about astronomy has been derived from observation and calculation over many generations. This has been ongoing since the beginning of man. In antiquity, these people still performed observations and made measurement on the [geocentric] sun, moon, planets and fixed stars. These same people (who observed and measured) appeared to live in a world which accepted that the Ptolemaic heavens were governed each by their god. This is theology based on astronomy. The astronomy drove the theology, not the other way around. As such it is accepted these people were engaged in "proto-science".

I'd love to find some clear link between the crucifixion of Jesus and the astronomical cross in Plato's Timaeus. Believe me I have looked. And if someone could provide evidence I have missed I'd love to hear about it. I'd like to think that there may have been some link between the idea of a crucified logos and Plato's chi/X. There may have been at some point. It's a possibility. It has some plausibility when considered from certain perspectives. But even if we were able to establish a link it would be another step entirely to go beyond that and "prove" that Christianity began as an astrotheological cult. (No-one can argue the Timaeus is an "astrotheological" guidebook -- at least I don't think they can.)

There could be any number of reasons for the link. From what we know of ancient mystical and philosophical thought we have to be open to a wide range of possible explanations. But if we did discover that the reason for the link really did involve some form of worship of heavenly bodies (the sky ones, I mean) then we would do so with clear evidence and sound method.
Textual criticism kind of rules the roost in study the NT. Above it occurred to me that while there is little in the textual plot of the NT to support any astrotheological ideas, there may be a great deal in the overall theme of the NT. The sun was thought to have traversed the Underworld and be resurrected each day. These guys literally believed in this model. This is a thematic thing.

If one of the major themes in the NT is not astrotheological (the dying of Jesus, his passage through (and conquest of) the underworld [of death], and his resurrection -all being related to the Sun) then what do you think it is?


Seriously. What do you think the theme of the NT actually is? (Not the plot) I gave my answer above.

At the moment all the arguments for astrotheology are speculative and fanciful from what I have seen.
This finding could be possibly explained by the fact that the major arguments for astrotheology are not based on the textual plot, but on the theme of the Jesus Story. How do you view this possibility?



LC
A "cobbler of fables" [Augustine]; "Leucius is the disciple of the devil" [Decretum Gelasianum]; and his books "should be utterly swept away and burned" [Pope Leo I]; they are the "source and mother of all heresy" [Photius]
User avatar
neilgodfrey
Posts: 6175
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:08 pm

Re: in defence of astrotheology

Post by neilgodfrey »

Stephan Huller wrote:As this conversation was boring one hundred posts ago - in keeping with the 'angel is hidden in the narrative' theme, the Samaritans understand that taabah (טֶ֙בַח֙) in Genesis 43:16 does not mean 'animal' as it is translated in the Jewish tradition but the name - Taabaah - of a 'secret being' who served the 12 brothers as far back as Genesis 22:24!

The point of course here is that even though you can't 'prove' the understanding that 72 is the number of the angelic 'secret' servant at least it has a tradition to support it. WTF does any of this 'astrotheology' have going for it?

In case the reader is interested 216 = gevurah, 72 = chesed and the two numbers are embedded in Exodus 14:19 - 21 each of the three verses has 72 letters so (72 x 3 = 216). The verse is always taken to have this 'hidden angel' embedded in its verses - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shemhamphorasch - i.e. the 72 and the 216, 216 of course = 6 x 6 x 6
72 also has Greek "traditions" behind it that "Luke", educated in the Greek classics, also knew. There are competing claims. The interpretation that has the greater explanatory power deserves to win the day and Gakuseidon has already asked Robert for the "meanings" that would given astrotheology its chance for the money. There was a reply but that only elaborated on the meaning for Robert or for astrotheology -- his explanations did not add anything to making new sense of the narratives themselves.
vridar.org Musings on biblical studies, politics, religion, ethics, human nature, tidbits from science
User avatar
neilgodfrey
Posts: 6175
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:08 pm

Re: in defence of astrotheology

Post by neilgodfrey »

Leucius Charinus wrote:
neilgodfrey wrote:The reason I presented the more detailed definition was to try to bring out the implications of that word "theology" in "astrotheology" and to stress the keyword "worship" in the definitions that you cite here.

I'm afraid I don't understand how we can validly include any interest or thoughts about astronomy in the definition (if that's what you mean?).
Yes it's precisely what I mean, as stated clearly in the definition furnished. Your focus on "theology" and "worship" seems to want to sweep the "astronomy" and the "observation and measurement" under the carpet. I don't see how we can validly preclude any and all astronomical interests.
The worship of the sun and moon is not the same as the observation of the sun and moon for the calendar. I fail to see how the two are necessarily equated.

I observe the stars, too, and tides and moon -- it's one of my "things" that I enjoy doing. I am not worshiping them. Many people today read their astrological reports; they are not worshiping the planets.
vridar.org Musings on biblical studies, politics, religion, ethics, human nature, tidbits from science
User avatar
Leucius Charinus
Posts: 3041
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 4:23 pm
Location: memoriae damnatio

Re: in defence of astrotheology

Post by Leucius Charinus »

neilgodfrey wrote:
Leucius Charinus wrote:
neilgodfrey wrote:The reason I presented the more detailed definition was to try to bring out the implications of that word "theology" in "astrotheology" and to stress the keyword "worship" in the definitions that you cite here.

I'm afraid I don't understand how we can validly include any interest or thoughts about astronomy in the definition (if that's what you mean?).
Yes it's precisely what I mean, as stated clearly in the definition furnished. Your focus on "theology" and "worship" seems to want to sweep the "astronomy" and the "observation and measurement" under the carpet. I don't see how we can validly preclude any and all astronomical interests.
The worship of the sun and moon is not the same as the observation of the sun and moon for the calendar. I fail to see how the two are necessarily equated.
In antiquity both these functions in the Roman Empire were the responsibility of, and under the control of, the Pontifex_Maximus in consultation with various colleges of priests.

The following from WIKI:
  • The main duty of the Pontifices was to maintain the pax deorum or "peace of the gods."[20][21][22]

    The immense authority of the sacred college of pontiffs was centered on the Pontifex Maximus, the other pontifices forming his consilium or advising body. His functions were partly sacrificial or ritualistic, but these were the least important. His real power lay in the administration of jus divinum or divine law;[23] the information collected by the pontifices related to the Roman religious tradition was bound in a corpus which summarized dogma and other concepts. The chief departments of jus divinum may be described as follows:

    1.The regulation of all expiatory ceremonials needed as a result of pestilence, lightning, etc.

    2.The consecration of all temples and other sacred places and objects dedicated to the gods. <<<===============
    3.The regulation of the calendar; both astronomically and in detailed application to the public life of the state. <<<=================

    4.The administration of the law relating to burials and burying-places, and the worship of the Manes or dead ancestors.
    5.The superintendence of all marriages by conferratio, i.e. originally of all legal patrician marriages.
    6.The administration of the law of adoption and of testamentary succession.
    7.The regulation of the public morals, and fining and punishing offending parties.

The following was Extracted from Cambridge Ancient History Volume 12 OFFICIAL RELIGION
  • p.412

    Religion in the Roman Empire was governed
    by the princeps, as "Pontifex Maximus"
    a member of all priestly colleges and
    responsible for all public morals and well being.



    The following is evidenced by coins and temple foundations:
    • Claudius: magnified the cult of Cybele.

      Gauis: in Rome introduced Osiris (and other Egyptian deities accepted in Italy)

      Vespasian: favored Isis and Sarapis.

      Domitian: was a benefactor of Isis, Minerva and Jupiter

      Hadrian: built the temple of Venus and restored many temples in Rome.

      Severan Dynasty: sponsored Bacchus, Hercules and Sarapis.

      Illyrian Dynasty: were devoted to Vesta.

      Aurelian: built the temple of Sol Invictus, celebrated 25th December and established priestly colleges.

      Diocletian: supported Sol Invictus, Isis, Sarapis, Jupiter and Hercules.

I observe the stars, too, and tides and moon -- it's one of my "things" that I enjoy doing. I am not worshiping them. Many people today read their astrological reports; they are not worshiping the planets.
But again this is a presentist observation. In antiquity, the Romans worshipped Mars, Venus, Mercury (as Hermes), Jupiter and Saturn. This type of astrotheological thinking pervaded the ancient geocentric world.





LC
Last edited by Leucius Charinus on Thu Mar 12, 2015 11:06 pm, edited 4 times in total.
A "cobbler of fables" [Augustine]; "Leucius is the disciple of the devil" [Decretum Gelasianum]; and his books "should be utterly swept away and burned" [Pope Leo I]; they are the "source and mother of all heresy" [Photius]
User avatar
neilgodfrey
Posts: 6175
Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 4:08 pm

Re: in defence of astrotheology

Post by neilgodfrey »

Leucius Charinus wrote:
neilgodfrey wrote:
The worship of the sun and moon is not the same as the observation of the sun and moon for the calendar. I fail to see how the two are necessarily equated.
In antiquity both these functions in the Roman Empire were the responsibility of, and under the control of, the Pontifex Maximus in consultation with various colleges of priests.

But again this is a presentist observation. In antiquity, the Romans worshipped Mars, Venus, Mercury (as Hermes), Jupiter and Saturn. This type of astrotheological thinking pervaded the ancient geocentric world.

LC
We will have to disagree. The literature of the day tells us that philosophers, mathematicians (also philosophers often enough), astronomers, fortune tellers, various religious groups, poets and other authors, agriculturalists, all had their own observations quite apart from the PM.

There was an abundance of literature involving astronomical and astrological concepts that did not necessitate worship of those bodies. Even if the authors did worship them there are many instances where the literature is quite unrelated to any such worship.
vridar.org Musings on biblical studies, politics, religion, ethics, human nature, tidbits from science
User avatar
Leucius Charinus
Posts: 3041
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 4:23 pm
Location: memoriae damnatio

Re: in defence of astrotheology

Post by Leucius Charinus »

neilgodfrey wrote:We will have to disagree. The literature of the day tells us that philosophers, mathematicians (also philosophers often enough), astronomers, fortune tellers, various religious groups, poets and other authors, agriculturalists, all had their own observations quite apart from the PM.
While that may be true, the public face of Roman religion was guided by the PM.
There was an abundance of literature involving astronomical and astrological concepts that did not necessitate worship of those bodies. Even if the authors did worship them there are many instances where the literature is quite unrelated to any such worship.

Augustus wrote in his "Res Gestae" ...... 21) "I built the temple of Mars the Avenger and the Forum Augustum on private ground from the proceeds of booty. I built the theatre adjacent to the temple of Apollo on ground in large part bought from private owners, and provided that it should be called after Marcus Marcellus, my son-in-law. 2 From the proceeds of booty I dedicated gifts in the Capitol and in the temples of the divine Julius, of Apollo, of Vesta and of Mars the Avenger; this cost me about 100,000,000 sesterces. "

Outside the literary record, the public face of Roman religion was reflected in monumental architecture. Temples here there and everywhere to one (astro) god or another.

So did Augustus worship Mars? And if he did so, did not the people follow in the worship? Sure there were people who thought this was BS (they may have "worshipped" a terrestrial deity, wine and Bacchus for example). So what?

We may disagree in our evaluation of the literary record, but I cant see how the archaeological record can be dismissed from the argument.



LC
A "cobbler of fables" [Augustine]; "Leucius is the disciple of the devil" [Decretum Gelasianum]; and his books "should be utterly swept away and burned" [Pope Leo I]; they are the "source and mother of all heresy" [Photius]
User avatar
GakuseiDon
Posts: 2564
Joined: Sat Oct 12, 2013 5:10 pm

Re: in defence of astrotheology

Post by GakuseiDon »

Robert Tulip wrote:
GakuseiDon wrote: how can you tell what came into Egyptian religion via copying the legends of ancient African cultures, and what came into Egyptian religion via astrotheology (i.e. looking into the skies)?
It is important to get away from the idea of “copying” understood as a conscious and deliberate transfer of ideas from one culture to another as the main reason for similar ideas to appear in different traditions. Rather, the process is that ideas evolve in complex cultural ways. They blend and fight, they grow and wither.

The three thousand or so years of Osiris, Isis and Horus belief in Egypt (and it is likely to be longer) created a large stable fecund durable meme, giving the myth the qualities seen in biology as required for evolutionary success. When the Egyptian culture died, its ideas did not simply die too, but morphed into different forms (eg Osiris => Lazarus).
Okay, granted I was wrong to use the word 'copied'. Perhaps 'influenced' is more accurate. But the question still stands as a question of methodology: how can you tell what came into Christianity from examining the skies, and what came into it via influence from earlier religions? Is it possible to determine that? How do you remove the spurious correlations?

For example, here is an editted list of astrotheological elements for the "Sun of God" from Acharya S's "The Christ Conspiracy", pages 155/156":
  • The following are the main characteristics of the “sun of God”:

    • The sun “dies” for three days at the winter solstice, to be born again or resurrected on December 25th .
    • The sun of God is “born of a virgin,” which refers to both the new or “virgin” moon and the constellation of Virgo.
    • The sun at its zenith, or 12 noon, is in the house or heavenly temple of the “Most High”; thus, “he” begins “his Father’s work” at “age” 12. Maxwell relates, “At that point, all Egypt offered prayers to the ‘Most High’ God!” [13]
    • The sun enters into each sign of the zodiac at 30°; hence, the “Sun of God” begins his ministry at “age” 30... [14]
    • The sun is the “Carpenter” who builds his daily “houses” or 12 two-hour divisions.
    • The sun’s “followers” or “disciples” are the 12 signs of the zodiac, through which the sun must pass.
    • The sun is “anointed” when its rays dip into the sea. [15]
    • The sun “changes water into wine” by creating rain, ripening the grape on the vine and fermenting the grape juice.
    • The sun “walks on water,” referring to its reflection. [16]
    • The sun “calms the sea” as he rests in the “boat of heaven.” (Mt. 8:23-7) [17]
    • When the sun is annually and monthly re-born, he brings life to the “solar mummy,” his previous self, raising it from the dead.
    • The sun triumphantly “rides an ass and her foal” into the “City of Peace” when it enters the sign of Cancer, which contains two stars called “little asses,” and reaches its fullness. [18]
    • The sun is “betrayed” by the constellation of the Scorpion, the backbiter, the time of the year when the solar hero loses his strength.
    • The sun is “crucified” between the two thieves of Sagittarius and Capricorn.
    • The sun is hung on a cross, which represents its passing through the equinoxes, the vernal equinox being Easter.
    • The sun does a “stutter-step” at the winter solstice, unsure whether to return to life or “resurrect,” doubted by his “twin” Thomas.
    • The sun is with us “always, to the close of the age” (Mt. 28:20), referring to the ages of the precession of the equinoxes.
    • The sun is the “Light of the World,” and “comes on clouds, and every eye shall see him.”
    • The sun wears a corona, “crown of thorns” or halo.
    • The sun is the Word or Logos of God.
Most elements don't have citations, but for those that do, the cites are below, with the full book reference taken from Acharya S's book. Out of interest, I googled each work and have given what appears to have been the first published date:
[13] Leedom, p, 23. -- Leedom, Tim, ed., The Book Your Church Doesn't Want You to Read, Kendall/Hunt, 1993
[14] Hazelrigg, p. 163. -- Hazelrigg, John, The Sun Book, Health Research, 1971 [Note: Seems to have been first published in 1916]
[15] Anderson, p. 206. -- Anderson, Karl, Astrology of the Old Testament, Health Research, 1970 [Note: Seems to have been first published in 1892]
[16] Massey, HJMC, p. 21. -- Massey, Gerald, The Historical Jesus and the Mythical Christ, Health Research [Note: Seems to have been first published in 1887]
[17] Leedom, p. 27. (as above)
[18] Pike, p. 465. -- Pike, Albert, The Morals and Dogma of Scottish Rite Freemasonry, LH Jenkins, 1928 [Note: Seems to have been first published in 1872]

How would you show that those elements (e.g. Son of God begins his father's work at age 12, begins his ministry at age 30, etc) have come from astrotheology? Is there any way? How would you remove the "false positives" from amongst the assertions above?
It is really important, in life, to concentrate our minds on our enthusiasms, not on our dislikes. -- Roger Pearse
Clive
Posts: 1197
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 2:20 pm

Re: in defence of astrotheology

Post by Clive »

Thought I would check something
Uranus (/ˈjʊərənəs/ or /jʊˈreɪnəs/; Ancient Greek Οὐρανός, Ouranos [oːranós] meaning "sky" or "heaven") was the primal Greek god personifying the sky. His equivalent in Roman mythology was Caelus. In Ancient Greek literature, Uranus or Father Sky was the son and husband of Gaia, Mother Earth. According to Hesiod's Theogony, Uranus was conceived by Gaia alone, but other sources cite Aether as his father.[3] Uranus and Gaia were the parents of the first generation of Titans, and the ancestors of most of the Greek gods, but no cult addressed directly to Uranus survived into Classical times,[4] and Uranus does not appear among the usual themes of Greek painted pottery. Elemental Earth, Sky and Styx might be joined, however, in a solemn invocation in Homeric epic.[5]
Wiki

Humans have for huge periods of time been conscious that they die and babies and suns are born. We try to work out what is going on using the pieces we have - sun moon sky earth thunder love anger.

Going for one cause - the stars - is a serious mistake. All of our experiences are continually woven together in our stories, our religions, our beliefs.
"We cannot slaughter each other out of the human impasse"
Mimi
Posts: 18
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 10:22 am

Re: in defence of astrotheology

Post by Mimi »

neilgodfrey wrote:Mimi, it is plain you have no interest in discussing anything with me but are interested in only throwing anything at me you think looks like mud, but I will try to point out to you that most of what you are saying does nothing more than demonstrate your own inability to comprehend simple prose passages. I selected quotes that specifically identified the meaning of astrotheology while you have selected quotes that merely come from the same discussion and that are nothing more than background historical material and that do not in themselves explain the meaning of astrotheology. You could just as easily have quoted passages that refer to the worship of fertility and said that was astrotheology, too, because the same article said that was also part of the background history.

That background is discussed in order to make the main argument for astrotheology more plausible. I have no reason to doubt that some ancient cultures did indeed embrace some form of astrotheology, by the way. What I dispute is that there is any evidence to indicate Christianity began as an astrotheology cult -- or that whatever is said to be evidence for this claim must compete with an abundance of other explanations for the same details.
No Neil, I'm not throwing any mud at you, only your own biases that are so obvious. The quotes you selected were "SELECTED" while conveniently leaving out what you don't like so that you can narrow the meaning and definition of astrotheology into a very small corner.
neilgodfrey wrote:"I have no reason to doubt that some ancient cultures did indeed embrace some form of astrotheology"
Why don't you use that as a starting point to make your case for astrotheology then? It would show how well you understand astrotheology as well as where you're coming from. I still feel I cannot trust you to be a reliable source of information on the topic of astrotheology due to your own rigid biases. It's a disservice to all freethinkers and I bring it to your attention because I'd like to think that you would not want to misinform or misrepresent the subject of astrotheology, a subject you have admitted that you avoided like the plague because you were not interested. If you're so uninterested then, why are you here trying to deny astrotheology exists and was syncretized into Christianity?
neilgodfrey wrote:"What I dispute is that there is any evidence to indicate Christianity began as an astrotheology cult -- or that whatever is said to be evidence for this claim must compete with an abundance of other explanations for the same details"
Yes you do, counter to what highly respected scholars who've actually studied the subject have to say and who concede that Christianity was syncretized from a collage of astrotheological religions. It's well documented but you refuse to study it for some reason. Why? Oh that's right, because you're an astrotheology denialist who favors anything so long as it's not astrotheology, which is just bizarre since the sun, moon, planets, stars, constellations and milky way exist and offer an Occam's razor explanation that gives a far better explanation than anything else you can come up with.

Even your hero Richard Carrier concedes the "celestial Jesus" as well as astral theology ie astrotheology:
"Element 14: Mystery cults spoke of their beliefs in public through myths and allegory, which symbolized a more secret doctrine that was usually rooted in a more esoteric astral or metaphysical theology. Therefore, as itself a mystery religion with secret doctrines, Christianity would have done the same."

- Richard Carrier, OHJ page 114
You and others here on an anti-astrotheology crusade have consistently avoided quotes, links and evidence that prove you wrong.

We can ignore Stephan Huller completely as he has absolutely nothing intelligent to add here and seems more like a troll than anything else. He should probably stick with topics he knows something about. What is his expertise anyway?

Deal with these instead of omitting them:
"...Christian scholars over the centuries have admitted that ... "there are parallels between the Mysteries and Christianity"1 and that "the miracle stories of the Gospels do in fact parallel literary forms found in pagan and Jewish miracle stories,"2 "...According to Form Criticism the Gospels are more like folklore and myth than historical fact."3

1. Metzger, HLS, 8.
2. Meier, II, 536.
3. Geisler, CA, 320.
- Who Was Jesus?, 259
"And when we say also that the Word, who is the first-birth of God, was produced without sexual union, and that He, Jesus Christ, our Teacher, was crucified and died, and rose again, and ascended into heaven, we propound nothing different from what you [PAGANS] believe regarding those whom you esteem sons of Jupiter...."

- Justin Martyr, First Apology
"It was in Roman Alexandria (30 BC-AD 394) that the new Christian religion blossomed, inspired by the writings of the Egyptian, Greek and Jewish philosophers."

- Egyptologist, Dr. Bojana Mosjov
What Egyptologists (and other scholars) say about Egypt's role in Christian origins

Even the Catholic church admits against its own interests that Christianity borrowed from a variety of Pagan religions, which would include sun worship or astrotheology:
"The well-known solar feast, however, of Natalis Invicti, celebrated on 25 December, has a strong claim on the responsibility for our December date. For the history of the solar cult, its position in the Roman Empire, and syncretism with Mithraism"
- Catholic Enc. Christmas
"Sunday was kept holy in honour of Mithra, and the sixteenth of each month was sacred to him as mediator. The 25 December was observed as his birthday, the natalis invicti, the rebirth of the winter-sun, unconquered by the rigours of the season."
- Catholic Enc. Mithraism
"...As concerns the prevalence of solar Yahwism in ancient Israel, Dr. J. Glen Taylor concludes:
"Several lines of evidence, both archaeological and biblical, bear witness to a close relationship between Yahweh and the sun. The nature of that association is such that often a 'solar' character was presumed for Yahweh. Indeed, at many points the sun actually represented Yahweh as a kind of 'icon.' Thus, in at least the vast majority of cases, biblical passages which refer to sun worship in Israel do not refer to a foreign phenomenon borrowed by idolatrous Israelites, but to a Yahwistic phenomenon which Deuteronomistic theology came to look upon as idolatrous.... an association between Yahweh and the sun was not limited to one or two obscure contexts, but was remarkably well integrated into the religion of ancient Israel." (Taylor, 257)
Hence, the sun was worshipped by the Israelites, who associated it with their tribal god Yahweh. Like Father, like son, and the connection between Jesus and the sun is first evidenced in the OT book of Malachi (4:2), which immediately precedes the New Testament and in which the author refers to the "Sun of Righteousness" who will "arise with healing in his wings." This scripture, which is in the last chapter before the Gospel of Matthew, sounds much like the winged solar disc of Babylon and Egypt.

Image

"The Sun of Righteousness will arise with healing in his wings."

This scripture in Malachi is perceived as a reference to the coming messiah, Jesus Christ. In this regard, this clearly solar appellation "Sun of Righteousness" is repeated many times by early Church fathers as being applicable to Christ.

Jesus as the Sun throughout History

Jesus Christ, Sun of Righteousness
[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=faILHU82-Cw[/youtube]
That video above, Jesus Christ, Sun of Righteousness, includes many quotes from early Christianity.

Star Worship of the Ancient Israelites

2,750-year-old solar-aligned temple discovered in Israel

The Astrotheological Origins of Christianity

The Zodiac and Judeo-Christian Astrotheology
National Geographic's "Ancient Astronomers" discusses the 16,000 year old cave painting/mural depicting the zodiac at Lascaux in Southern France with archaeoastronomer, Chantal Jegues-Wolkiewiez:

National Geographic's "Ancient Astronomers"

Stone Age Zodiac
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZfbE-syvLpE
Ezekiel 8:16 "And he brought me into the inner court of the house of the Lord; and behold, at the door of the temple of the Lord, between the porch and the altar, were about twenty-five men, with their backs to the temple of the Lord, and their faces toward the east, worshiping the sun toward the east."
"...in his Apology (16), Tertullian raises the subject of Roman gods in the shape of a cross or in cruciform: We have shown before that your deities are derived from shapes modelled from the cross. But you also worship victories, for in your trophies the cross is the heart of the trophy. The camp religion of the Romans is all through a worship of the standards, a setting the standards above all gods. Well, as those images decking out the standards are ornaments of crosses. All those hangings of your standards and banners are robes of crosses.3 Hence, Tertullian attested that the Romans bore images of not only a man but also gods on crosses, that they additionally possessed gods themselves in cruciform and that these images were objects of worship...."

"In its article on Tertullian, the Catholic Encyclopedia paraphrases the pertinent parts of the Church father's work thus:

"…your gods are images made on a cross framework, so you worship crosses. You say we worship the sun; so do you."

- Who Was Jesus? Fingerprints of The Christ (WWJ) (243-4)
Tertullian Chapter XIII - The Charge of Worshipping the Sun Met by a Retort

"Others, with greater regard to good manners, it must be confessed, suppose that the sun is the god of the Christians, because it is a well-known fact that we pray towards the east, or because we make Sunday a day of festivity. What then? Do you do less than this? Do not many among you, with an affectation of sometimes worshipping the heavenly bodies likewise, move your lips in the direction of the sunrise? It is you, at all events, who have even admitted the sun into the calendar of the week; and you have selected its day,215 in preference to the preceding day216 as the most suitable in the week217 for either an entire abstinence from the bath, or for its postponement until the evening, or for taking rest and for banqueting. By resorting to these customs, you deliberately deviate from your own religious rites to those of strangers. For the Jewish feasts on the Sabbath and "the Purification,"218 and Jewish also are the ceremonies of the lamps,219 and the fasts of unleavened bread, and the "littoral prayers,"220 all which institutions and practices are of course foreign from your gods. Wherefore, that I may return from this digression, you who reproach us with the sun and Sunday should consider your proximity to us. We are not far off from your Saturn and your days of rest."
"At Stonehenge in England and Carnac in France, in Egypt and Yucatan, across the whole face of the earth are found mysterious ruins of ancient monuments, monuments with astronomical significance. These relics of other times are as accessible as the American Midwest and as remote as the jungles of Guatemala. Some of them were built according to celestial alignments; others were actually precision astronomical observatories ... Careful observation of the celestial rhythms was compellingly important to early peoples, and their expertise, in some respects, was not equaled in Europe until three thousand years later."

- Dr. Edwin Krupp, Astronomer and Director of the Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles
Again, it would be wise for the critics to actually study the subject of astrotheology before jumping to false preconceived assumptions.
Post Reply