Biblical Criticism & History Forum - earlywritings.com

robert j wrote: Paul got the ball rolling, writing about what found it in the LXX ---


And Paul’s trusty source of many of his revelations, the LXX, went something like this ---

Both unsubstantiated.


Paul did use the LXX but reading to far into this previous text is not substantiated.


He certainly started nothing, nor got he ball rolling.

outhouse wrote:Carrier and Doherty have you brainwashed using extreme criticism applied one way.

What you're telling us by your posts, outhouse, is that you have nothing meaningful to say and so have decided merely to be spiteful.

After reading Pauls material, there is no such teaching of a heavenly only jesus concept in any way shape or form so far in any of the following.

These books all state death and resurrection and emphasis on power. Nothing that remotely proposes a heavenly only Jesus, Paul just isn't teaching that horse crap.

Romans
Philippians
1 Thessalonians
Philemon

Read every word on the above books and now reading the rest of Pauls 7 attributed Epistles again.

Peter Kirby wrote:

outhouse wrote:Carrier and Doherty have you brainwashed using extreme criticism applied one way.

What you're telling us by your posts, outhouse, is that you have nothing meaningful to say and so have decided merely to be spiteful.

Dude.

After reading these books again, 3 to go, that heavenly only garbage is not being taught to any community.


So where does it come from? It doesn't come from the text.


The weak part was trying to claim paul invented all this by use of overly critical source, and so name throwing of Carrier, Doherty, Neil, and a few others. Great!! you have under ten out of thousands of credible scholars. YEC has more support.

Hell I gave you the benefit of doubt on "seed of david" despite the consensus being against you. So don't act like im spiteful when you step on my toes for seeing the same thing after study as the consensus you personally are fighting.

outhouse wrote:These books all state death and resurrection and emphasis on power. Nothing that remotely proposes a heavenly only Jesus, Paul just isn't teaching that horse crap.

I really wish I had a decent sparring partner here.

Peter Kirby wrote:

outhouse wrote:These books all state death and resurrection and emphasis on power. Nothing that remotely proposes a heavenly only Jesus, Paul just isn't teaching that horse crap.

I really wish I had a decent sparring partner here.

Its on you to prove your point. I cannot defend against the yellow plastic ducky caused the big bang.

Can you pick a paragraph out of Pauls 7 epistles/letters that teaches that?????????

What?

Peter Kirby wrote:What?

Can you pick a single paragraph out of Pauls 7 epistles/letters that teaches that Jesus was only a heavenly entity ?????????


Or do you have to line up a mile of hurdles before it makes any sense?

And its not "The Outhouse Interpretation of Paul's Letters"

Its modern scholarship interpretation of Pauls Epistles. Because my version is one and the same.